Answer: One significant distinction among Kush and Egypt is their areas. Kush was a domain toward the south of Egypt and was worked at the base of the mountains. They had a consistent measure of precipitation. This precipitation combined with the spillover from the mountains implied that they quite often had fruitful soil. This was an alternate story for Egypt. Egypt relied upon the yearly flooding of the Nile River so as to have great soil to plant and develop food required for endurance. This flooding was indispensable to their progress. Another contrast among Kush and Egypt is that sovereigns governed Kush, not at all like the male lords and pharaohs that controlled Egypt. They additionally fabricated burial chambers like the Egyptians did however the Kush by and large constructed burial chambers with level rooftops on them. Kush likewise had regular assets, for example, gold, ivory, and iron metal. Preservation is likewise a region where they had a few contrasts. The cycle of embalmment in Egypt was frequently held for those with abundance on the grounds that the cycle was costly and the average citizens couldn't manage the cost of it. Kush aristocrats likewise embalmed their dead however the ordinary citizens preserved their dead also.
Explanation:
Federal and State governments have to protect extinction threatened animals <u>- Endangered Species Act</u>. Air pollution from industries and cars is limited by <u>Clean Air Act.</u>
<h3>Which Acts protect the environment?</h3><h3 />
The Clean Air Act (CAA) was passed to limit air pollution by requiring that industries and car markers, reduce the air pollution that they and their products cause.
The Endangered Species Act then requires that both the state and federal governments should act as best as they can to protect any animal that is threatened with extinction.
Find out more on the Clean Air Act at brainly.com/question/2116843.
#SPJ4
Answer:
Giving Feedback
Explanation:
It is a positive way on telling someone if they do their job good or bad.
Daniel Levinson, a psychologist
who graduated from Yale was the one that developed a model of adult
socialization, which includes stages of early adult, midlife, and later adult
transitions. According to Levinson’s model:
Early adult transition spans age 17 – 22
Middle adult transition spans age 40 – 45
Late adult transition
spans age 60 – 65
The Supreme Court overturn the conviction of Ernesto Miranda in 1966 because the police had failed to first inform Miranda of his right to an attorney and against self-incrimination.
<h3>What was the conviction of
Ernesto Miranda?</h3>
The case was related to Miranda who was found guilty of kidnapping and ra-pe and was sentenced to 20-30 years imprisonment on each count.
After the appeal of the case, the Supreme Court of Arizona held that Miranda's constitutional rights were not violated in obtaining the confession, hence, it overturn the conviction of Ernesto Miranda in 1966 because the police had failed to first inform Miranda of his right to an attorney and against self-incrimination.
Read more about Ernesto Miranda
brainly.com/question/2039279
#SPJ1
