Answer: Allocating indirect expenses to the department.
Explanation:
Indirect Expenses are those expenses that the entire business incurred and not just that particular department or segment. This means that it cannot be directly attributed to any one instrument of expense such as products or services.
This is why when it comes to allocating indirect costs which has to be done to maintin proper records, apportioning those costs to each department is challenging because the amount of cost due is not plain or direct.
Answer:
the cost of goods sold during the year 2012 is $800,000
Explanation:
The computation of the cost of goods sold is shown below;
Costs of Goods Sold during 2012 is
= Transferred from Work in Process + Beginning Inventory - Ending Inventory
= $1,000,000 + $200,000 - $400,000
= $800,000
Hence, the cost of goods sold during the year 2012 is $800,000
According to the given scenario, Miranda has discovered that her new business will definitely be successful. Thus, option first is correct.
<h3>What is Business?</h3>
A business is an organization or enterprising body that engages in commercial, industrial, or professional activities. Businesses can be nonprofit organizations or for-profit enterprises.
Among the various business structures are partnerships, corporations, limited liability companies, and sole proprietorship.
According to the above situation, Miranda has learned that the future of her new company is bright as he has taken certain important steps in order to grow her business.
Therefore, it can be concluded that first is correct.
Learn more about business here:
brainly.com/question/15826604
#SPJ1
Answer:
I beleive this one would be a bit of a matter of opinion when it comes down to it, but personally I would call it a bit unethical.
Explanation:
Escpecially when it comes to something like medication, it feels unethical to be advertising yourself as the only brand that will work. In my mind unique selling proposition would be focusing on what differentiates your product from others (example, my product can provide 48 hour vs other brands that only offer 24 hour) Simply stating their brand is the only solution feels unethical and does not provide ample evidence of this claim to customers in my opinion. I don't think it would be considered illegal, but in my mind its tiptoeing the line of ethics.
