Because it offers the historian an objective snapshot of the public sentiment of the time, which the cartoonist (should be) distilling for their readers, according to their feelings, for mass appeal. I say objective as it is usually very easy to decipher their subjective viewpoint according to the publication. The value of this is that it is tapping into how the masses 'feel' rather than how subjective facts can be built to form historical opinion. It becomes especially valuable prior to this century, when public sentiment is harder to garner as we were less technologically advanced.
One of the reasons that some did city-states in the Delian League revolted against Athens is because "<span>A) They resented not having a say in the government" since the heart of the government lay in the Athenian Democracy.
</span>
Answer:
A. Some communities have become less religious, while others have taken religion to extremes.
Explanation:
- Dramatic social changes at the end of 20th Century have called into question the recently unquestioned secularization diagnosis of religiosity in contemporary societies.
- In contrast to the projected recession, religiosity, in the late 1980s and early 1990s, permeated and permeated almost all segments of previously alleged atheist societies.
- The search for an explanation of recent religious changes in transition societies raises many questions about the relationship between socialism and modernity.
Answer:
Analyze the author’s background to evaluate any potential bias.
Explanation:
This is the best strategy for Jane to follow. It is always useful to analyze the authors' background when researching a particular topic, as this allows us to establish whether the authors are reliable sources. However, this is even more important in cases in which the author's opinions prove to be an anomaly. In these cases, it is likely that the author writes in this way because of bias.
