The two significant issues regarding the ceo pay debate are -
a) the relationship between firm performance and CEO pay
b) the size of the CEO compensation in relation to average employee pay
Chief Executive Officers (CEOs) often receive large sums of money in the form of salaries and bonuses from commercial companies. This is sometimes defended by a peer-to-peer argument; roughly "our" CEO will be paid what other CEOs of comparable companies receive.
On the face of it, this seems like a bad excuse for morally outrageous compensation schemes, and thus this argument has been overlooked in the philosophical literature in the past. In contrast, however, this article provides a defense of the peer-to-peer argument. In addition, it is shown how rigorous examination of this argument sheds light on incentive-based and desert-based theories of fair wages.
To learn more about CEO pay from given link
brainly.com/question/16557894
#SPJ4
Answer:
They organize the way a group meeting will run.
They guide discussion so that everyone contributes equally.
They resolve conflicts and make sure all opinions are heard.
Explanation:
Answer:production era
Explanation: because production means like to create something
Answer:
60,120 units
Explanation:
The computation of the production units is shown below:
Production units = Projected sales units + ending inventory units - beginning inventory units
= 58,900 machines + 7,310 units - 6,090 units
= 60,120 units
We simply added the ending inventory units and deduct the beginning inventory units to the projected sales units so that the correct amount could come
