24% of the questions were not answered correctly
six
Step-by-step explanation:
the reason is this: let steak be (s), pork be (p), grilled chicken be (gc), tea be (t), and coffee be (c)
now, we want to find the total number of outcomes, and this cannot be determined by a simple roll of the dice. you have to count the sample space required for EVERY outcome, and it has to lie within the conditions. so, assuming David only takes 1 main course and 1 drink, he would be down to six option, which are :
1. s & t
2. s & c
3. p & t
4. p & c
5. gc & t
6. gc & c
N-10+9n-3
n+9n=10n
10-3=7
so the answer is....
-13+10n
Answer:
The statement is missing. The statement is -- "A ray can be part of a line."
The answer is : The converse is not true, so Jahmiah is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
A conditional statement is represented by showing p → q. It means if p is correct or true, then q is also correct or true.
And the converse of p → q can be shown as q → p.
But we know that the converse of a statement is not always true, it may be true and may not be true.
In the context, the statement is " a ray can be a part of a line." And so the converse would be "A line can be a part of the ray".
So by definition we know that a line is continuous line having no end points, it extends in one direction. While a ray starts from a point and extends to infinity in one direction.
Thus ray is part of line but line is not a part of the ray. So the converse of the statement is not correct.
Hence, Jahmiah is correct.
