1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Black_prince [1.1K]
3 years ago
8

What did the NAACP argue in the Brown v. Board of Education case? How did the Brown v Board of Education ruling impact the lives

of southerners? What bearing did it have on the Plessey v. Ferguson ruling of 1896?
History
1 answer:
Radda [10]3 years ago
8 0
Your answer would be, That, the NAACP, argue in Brown v. Board of Education case, that the "Separate but Equal" violated the 14th. Amendment Clause, States that, the freedom and privileges of US. citizens must be equally protected. The Supreme Court declared the doctrine of "Separate but Equal" unconstitutional on the grounds it provide inferior education. This initiated the process to dismantle segregation in the schools. People question the ruling of Plessy v. Ferguson, but could not change the past. Thurgood Marshall was the lead lawyer in the case.






Hope that helps!!!
You might be interested in
What was the outcome of the Worcester v. Georgia court case? A. The Cherokees won the right to stay on their land and were deeme
Evgen [1.6K]

Answer:  A. The Cherokees won the right to stay on their land and were deemed an independent nation.

<em>(That was a hollow victory though -- see last paragraph of explanation below.)</em>

<em />

Explanation:

The 1832 case, Worcester v. Georgia, ruled unconstitutional a Georgia law requiring non-Native Americans requiring a license from the state to be on Native American land.  In responding to the case, the Supreme Court asserted that the federal government is the sole authority to deal with a Native American nation.  From this Supreme Court assertion came the beginnings of tribal sovereignty within the United States for Native American nations -- that the US government would deal with them as domestic nations inside the United States.

The court case was named after Samuel Worcester, a Christian minister working among the Cherokee who was supportive of the Cherokee cause.  To block the activity of a man like Rev. Worcester, the state of Georgia passed a law prohibiting white persons to live within the Cherokee Nation territory without permission from the Georgia state government.  Worcester and other missionaries challenged this law, and the case rose to the level of a Supreme Court decision.  The decision by the Supreme Court, written by Chief Justice Marshall, struck down the Georgia law and reprimanded Georgia for interfering in the affairs of the Cherokee Nation.  Marshall wrote that Indian nations are "distinct, independent political communities retaining their original natural rights." 

But President Andrew Jackson chose not to enforce the court's decision.  He said at the time: "The decision of the Supreme Court has fell stillborn, and they find that it cannot coerce Georgia to yield to its mandate."  He told the Cherokee that they would need to operate under the jurisdiction of the state of Georgia or else relocate.  This was a step in the direction of what became known as the "Trail of Tears," when the Cherokee were removed from Georgia and moved to territory in Oklahoma.

3 0
3 years ago
What makes social media so successful as a tool for political change?
Sidana [21]

Answer:

I would say B

Explanation:

Many people use social media, so with a bit of targeting, one can easily reach a large number of their intended audience.

5 0
3 years ago
Why was the articles of confederation purposely created to be weak?
gayaneshka [121]

Answer: Because of widespread fear of a strong central government at the time they were written and strong loyalties among Americans to their own state as opposed to any national government during the American Revolution, the Articles of Confederation purposely kept the national government as weak as possible

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
;fasjngerungnaegoigogooefoiwfjfsl
sammy [17]

Answer:uierihu4ihvk45y4yqebqxynrgywgruxwejhcwbroyujhbfnceiuhgjmeiurtnuytnivntihbe6oiyn voui6hyoem6eo 8hmyufhtjoiwmi9rtih58yhimh89hy irty fiy

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
During turn-in you find live ammunition rounds mixed in with the residue. what will the asp do first?
zheka24 [161]
<span>I believe the immediate response from asp would be to confiscate my findings and have the rest analyzed for potential dangers. Live ammunition implies that what we're dealing with could potentially harm those involved, so the first act would be to deal with said danger.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Powers shared with the federal government are called powers.
    6·1 answer
  • When reading bills and laws, why is it important to watch out for jargon?
    12·1 answer
  • What are two reasons why Douglas opposed John Browns plan to raid Harper’s ferry
    7·1 answer
  • What statement best describes the Catholic Church Catholic
    12·1 answer
  • Name two technological advances that helped make<br> cities more livable.
    10·1 answer
  • What helped the spread of hinduism? select one:
    6·1 answer
  • What was the purpose of most Zen gardens?
    5·1 answer
  • What is this called please help!!! I’ll mark brainlist ;)
    10·1 answer
  • Around <br> people were added to the kingdom of God after hearing Peter's Pentecost message.
    6·1 answer
  • Why is history open to ongoing and changing interpretations? A. Changing values limit interpretation. B. New evidence is not ava
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!