Answer:
Specificity principle
Explanation:
The specificity principle indicates when a speaker is able to speak with specific way and with precision. In athletic field, the term defines moving from general to specific.
In the similar manner, the principle of specificity works in public speaking. An orator, who used the principle of specificity moves from general point of view to specific point of view. This priniciple requires to eliminate any ambiguity and provide precision and clarity.
<u>In the given scenario, Laila moved from general to specific details. First, she detailed that how poverty is a world-wide problem then she described poverty in America and then move to specificity, describing poor conditions of her home town.</u>
Thus, she has used the principle of specificity.
Answer:
srisr8sr8s8rrs8rrr8s8rsr8s484s48s844s8ssr88rs8rs9rs
<span>Each animal sits with their own kind and arrange as they to gather to hear major is the significant thing as they separate themselves from other animals that were in the back. This makes the pigs sit in front of the dogs making the arrangement for future meetings or events.</span>
Answer: Catholic Church.
Explanation:
And this was not only the case during the early Middle Ages but the entire Middle Ages. In Western Europe, society was completely under the Catholic Church's influence, which completely controlled every segment of society. Science, culture and the arts, and even political leaders were arrested by church dignitaries, the pope who was the greatest authority.
According to some academics, the Bubonic Plague improved considerably many aspects in Europe. European cities began to improve the health conditions in both the streets and homes. Drainage and sewerage services began to be used in order to prevent future plagues.
The reduction in the population also affected the economy of some European countries in a positive way. The working force was considerably reduced, causing a greater demand for workers and increases in wages. Therefore, the purchasing power of the people increased as well as the standards of living.
The quality of the fields also improved considerably. The decrease in the population reduced the need to cultivate quickly, so the crops had more time to be harvested. Also, with a reduction in the number of people who inhabited the land, there was more space in lands to be cultivated. As a result, the population was able to acquire better-quality products.