1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dmitriy555 [2]
3 years ago
11

Civil disobedience is a violent action taken by individuals in which one defies a law seen as unjust.

History
1 answer:
olganol [36]3 years ago
4 0

False, Civil disobedience is not violent

You might be interested in
Help Pls
enyata [817]

Answer:

Q.1 What happened during the rise of the Berlin Wall ?

After several weeks of civil unrest, the East German government announced on 9 November 1989 that all GDR citizens could visit West Germany and West Berlin. Crowds of East Germans crossed and climbed onto the Wall, joined by West Germans on the other side in a celebratory atmosphere.

Q.2 What happened during Fall of the Berlin Wall?

some outcomes of the fall of the Berlin Wall were the end of travel restrictions for East Germans, a sudden increase of East Germans moving to the West, and the change from a planned economy to a free market.

6 0
3 years ago
The Sumerians have been given credit for inventing the cart, the wagon, the chariot, and a new technology to make pottery. All t
uranmaximum [27]
A car maybe? that is a kinda tuff
5 0
3 years ago
while this country never formally joined to Axis Powers or joined World War ll, it did form an alliance with Germany and did in
Otrada [13]

Axis would have probably wiped out most of its West-European enemies. Canada would probably have tried to fight against America and failed, getting its armies crushed, or stayed on the defensive. Hitler would probably have had more troops and peace of  mind tromping around around the Soviet grounds, and would have lost a lot less manpower than when the US actually went to war in the real WWII. Since I'm assuming that in this hypothetical scenario, the US was allied with Japan, Pearl Harbor never happened. Japan and America would both have undisputed hold of the Pacific, with America's (unsunken) battleships and aircraft carriers along with Japanese suprbattleships like the Yamato, and dual force garrisons on the pacific islands. America might have invaded the lower Americas as well, if it didn't stop at securing the border. Mexico might have joined in to help the Axis powers. Then Hitler would still turn on Stalin, still loose an ungodly portion of his army in Russia, get driven back, and start losing the war in the European theatre, at least until axis forces come to back him up, primarily in the form of American Axis soldiers. Then America would lose many men in the Russian front, until it finally invaded Russia somehow (probably after many years and the combined nuclear armaments research being conducted by the US and Nazi Germany.) After invading Russia, Hitler will grow pompous and attempt to invade America with his already weakened force. He would attempt to destroy the remaining American troops in the European/Asian Theatre. America and Japan would probably ally with each other to maintain their hold of the Pacific, and fight back, with a smaller scale D-Day happening (Only made up of Americans) being launched from the invaded and annexed New American Britain or New German Britain or whatever. America would invade Germany, while Germany cannot invade America (see other Quora posts for explanations on why it is virtually impossible to invade America). America ends up with territories and troops spread all across the Pacific, Africa, Russia, Europe, and Asia, with probably troops in Canada and Mexico as well. Consequently, the troops will be brought down through the freedom fighters and rebellions that will ultimately pop up. Hitler shoots himself in the bunker as well.

Lots of bloodshed. Thank god it didn't happen this way! A lot of countries would be utterly in ruins after this version of the World War, not just Poland and Germany and England and Russia and Korea and China (etc.), but who knows how many more countless places. Not to say that I am okay with WWII happening how it did anyway, since it was extremely bloody as well, but... the real WWII was a giant bloody clash of death. This hypothetical one wouldn't have been a clash. It would have been a giant cluster that resulted in possibly twice or three times as many deaths, mostly more civilian deaths in general.

5 0
3 years ago
James Oglethorpe founded
Natali5045456 [20]

Answer:

James Oglethorpe was the founder of the colony of Georgia.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
What was a significant result of the French and Indian War?
vladimir1956 [14]

Answer:

There was a large increase in the British debt.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • served a role between the Sumerians and the gods? a. farmers c. war chiefs b. priests d. political leaders
    10·2 answers
  • During World War II, Bell Aircraft had the GREATEST impact on which area on the map?
    7·2 answers
  • Why did the Dakota Sioux start an uprising in 1862?
    14·1 answer
  • In 1993 congress repealed prohibition with what amendment
    10·1 answer
  • Why did President Truman decide to drop atomic bombson Japanese cities in August 1945?
    15·1 answer
  • Mark the statement that is NOT true. Spartas main strength was in its navy. Anthem' main strength was in its navy. Solon establi
    15·1 answer
  • The council system is important because
    15·1 answer
  • Please answer quickly!!!!!
    9·1 answer
  • Check the two statements that are true of a Communist government.
    7·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP‼️‼️
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!