the answer is c: american military and financial intervention in the war
if its wrong my bad......
Answer:
No, I don’t think the Brown court would have said that people could be separated by race on a train. Brown fought against segregation in schools because it was unconstitutional and violated the 14th Amendment. I can’t see why they would agree with segregation in other institutions.
The Plessy case, which occurred quite a bit earlier than the Brown case, ruled that segregation was okay as long as it was “separate but equal.” If it was Plessy v. Brown, Brown could have made the argument that “If it has to be separate, it’s not truly equal.” There’s no reason to divide the people unless there’s unfair treatment involved.
Answer:
Cases such as robberies, theft, assault, traffic violations, murder, and crimes against property or persons are within the jurisdiction of the state courts. State courts are the final arbiters of state laws and constitutions.
Explanation:
Traveling to and from cities became easier. (I think thats correct)
Answer: the correct answer is Louis XVI of France's grandson , Phillip, was placed on the French throne with the agreement that the French and Spanish thrones would never be united.
Explanation:
Charles II of Spain named Philip of France as his succesor before dying.
Actually, the treaties allowed Philip to take the Spanish throne but he had to resign his claim to the French throne.
