The Hamburg Massacre (or Red Shirt Massacre or Hamburg riot) was a key event in the African American town of Hamburg, South Carolina in July 1876, leading up to the last election season of the Reconstruction Era. It was the first of a series of civil disturbances planned and carried out by white Democrats in the majority-black Republican Edgefield District, with the goal of suppressing black voting, disrupting Republican meetings, and suppressing black Americans civil rights, through actual and threatened violence.[1]
Beginning with a dispute over free passage on a public road, the massacre was rooted in racial hatred and political motives. A court hearing attracted armed white "rifle clubs," colloquially called the "Red Shirts". Desiring to regain control of state governments and eradicate the civil rights of black Americans, over 100 white men attacked about 30 black servicemen of the National Guard at the armory, killing two as they tried to leave that night. Later that night, the Red Shirts tortured and murdered four of the militia while holding them as prisoners, and wounded several others. In total, the events in Hamburg resulted in the death of one white man and six black men with several more blacks being wounded. Although 94 white men were indicted for murder by a coroner's jury, none were prosecuted.
The events were a catalyst in the overarching violence in the volatile 1876 election campaign. There were other episodes of violence in the months before the election, including an estimated 100 blacks killed during several days in Ellenton, South Carolina, also in Aiken County. The Southern Democrats succeeded in "redeeming" the state government and electing Wade Hampton III as governor. During the remainder of the century, they passed laws to establish single-party white rule, impose legal segregation and "Jim Crow," and disenfranchise blacks with a new state constitution adopted in 1895. This exclusion of blacks from the political system was effectively maintained into the late 1960s.
Answer:
Correct answer: Igor Stravisnky's great diversity of music styles.
Explanation:
The Russian composer Igor Stravinsky has been recognized as the most important figure in the musical panorama of the 20th century. His influence on the development of the new currents of the twentieth century resembles that of the painter Pablo Picasso in the plastic arts. Much of his life has been narrated by the author himself in the book "Stravinsky: an autobiography", published in New York in 1939. Stravisnky's great diversity of music styles, from baroque music to dodecaphonism, makes each of his works different but always maintaining a great personality.
Answer:
social withdrawal; sociability
Explanation:
Social withdrawal: In psychology, the term "social withdrawal" is referred to as a condition in which an individual tends to avoid the other person and various activities that he or she used to enjoy. It can cause depression, loneliness, etc. An individual who is dealing with social withdrawal generally feels isolated and spends time alone with oneself and referred to as an introvert.
Sociability: In psychology, the term "sociability" is considered as one of the personality traits that describes the capability of an individual to be fond of another person's company and seeks for opportunity related to social contact with other individuals and are referred to as extrovert.
The statement that is true about listening is that B. listening involves making an effort to process and retain information.
<h3>What is listening?</h3>
It should be noted that listening simply means to give attention to an individual who's speaking. It should be noted that listening is important in conservation.
One soft talent that helps people understand what others say to them is listening. It is a component of the communication skill set, which also includes verbal communication (commonly known as speaking) and interpersonal skills.
In this case, when people listen, they are able to acquire the needed information.
In conclusion, the correct option is B.
Learn more about listening on:
brainly.com/question/431494
#SPJ1
An archenemy is someone who is hostile towards someone or something else. In this case, the US and Soviet Union were archenemies because they were both very powerful and both of them wanted to be better than the other.
Hope this helps :)
