<h3>
Answer:</h3>
Self-serving bias
<h3>
Explanation:</h3>
The reason why "Self-serving bias" would be the correct answer because Janet gave a reason to why she didn't get the job offer to make her feel good.
Janet is pretty much trying to keep her self-esteem high, due to the fact that she didn't get the job offer.
Janet would be "hiding" the literal reason to why she didn't get the job offer. Janet could've possibly not got the job for other reasons, but instead she blames it on the interviewer and says how that day wasn't a good day.
You can tell it's self-serving bias because she's giving a excuse to why she didn't get the job offer, but gives a valid statement to why the other person, Ellen, didn't get the job offer.
She gives a valid reason to why Ellen didn't get the job offer, due to the fact that she wasn't qualified, while she gives herself an excuse of the interviewer being biased as the reason she didn't get the job offer. Janet is "favoring" herself in this situation.
<h3>I hope this helped you out.</h3><h3>Good luck on your academics.</h3><h3>Have a fantastic day!</h3>
It is an upper-middle income country
<u>Answer:
</u>
The act of denying the job to the candidates that passed the test and in order to Ann Smith who failed the test is illegal.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- Irrespective of what the gender of the candidate is, denying the job to a candidate who fulfills all the requirements so that the job can be offered to someone else who does not fulfill those is illegitimate.
- No matter what the policy of the company is, preferring a failed candidate over other candidates that passed cannot be considered as legal.
It can thin out the ozone layer
Answer:
In Marbury v. Madison, decided in 1803, the Supreme Court, for the first time, struck down an act of Congress as unconstitutional. This decision created the doctrine of judicial review and set up the Supreme Court of the United States as chief interpreter of the Constitution.
Explanation:
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483, was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that U.S. state laws establishing racial segregation in public schools are unconstitutional, even if the segregated schools are otherwise equal in quality.
Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537, was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation laws for public facilities as long as the segregated facilities were equal in quality, a doctrine that came to be known as "separate but equal".
Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503, was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that defined First Amendment rights of students in U.S. public schools.
HOPE THIS HELP!! :) please mark brainliest