1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Leya [2.2K]
4 years ago
15

Arthur Young states that there is a great difference between the “lower people” in England and France. Who does he blame for tha

t difference? Why?
Compare the life of the woman Arthur Young met to the lives of Louis XVI, Marie Antoinette, and other members of the First and Second Estates.
History
1 answer:
Lisa [10]4 years ago
4 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Arthur Young states that there is a great difference between the “lower people” in England and France. Who does he blame for that difference?

He blamed the government of France. Why? Because it oppressed the French people and forced them to pay heavy taxation. That is why the woman had a sad wrinkled face that reflected pain and desperation.

The life of the woman Arthur Young met was of poverty, suffering, pain, and despair. She was a very poor woman like many French people from the Third State. In comparison, the lives of Louis XVI, Marie Antoinette, and other members of the First and Second Estates were full of unnecessary luxuries and flamboyant styles, when the people of France were starving. That is why the French Revolution started, for the many injustices and poverty, while the French crown lived a luxurious life.

You might be interested in
11) A boy is standing next to a radio. As he moves away from the radio, which would MOST LIKELY occur? A) an increase in the spe
Anestetic [448]

a decrease in speed of sound waves okay my friend

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did settlers travel west ,and what challenges did they face in this journey
Sophie [7]

Answer:

Explanation:

Once they embarked, settlers faced numerous challenges: oxen dying of thirst, overloaded wagons, and dysentery, among others. Trails were poorly marked and hard to follow, and travelers often lost their way. Guidebooks attempted to advise travelers, but they were often unreliable.

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor is an illustration of the
Rashid [163]

Answer:

Impact a single event can have on public opinion in a time of crisis.

7 0
3 years ago
In 1786, Captain Daniel Shay led a series of attacks on courthouses to
son4ous [18]

In 1786 Captain Daniel Shay led a series of attacks on courthouses to block foreclosures on farms.  

<u>Explanation:</u>

Shay’s rebellion was led by soldiers who fought in the Revolutionary war and later became farmers. They received very little compensation after the war and suffered several hardships.

When businesses in Boston demanded immediate cash payment the farmers who usually bought on credit had to suffer. Circulation of paper currency was also limited.  

The farmers didn’t have gold or silver to settle their debts. Above all that the rate of tax in Massachusetts was very high. All these factors made farmers suffer hardships.

When peaceful measures to get their problems solved by authorities failed, the people took to rebellion. Shay’s rebellion emerged at that period.  

4 0
4 years ago
Washington said we can't have “national morality" without "religious principles." Do you agree with him? Explain ​
sleet_krkn [62]

Answer:

In “The Farewell Address,” George Washington describes religion and morality as the two indispensable pillars which support political prosperity. He then says that we should be cautious about the idea that morality can flourish without religion and concludes with the assertion:

"Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle."

There is considerable debate about the religious opinions of the founding fathers, including Washington. Whether he meant it or not, however, this statement is clearly false. There is no clear correlation between religious principles and national morality, let alone any good evidence that one causes the other. This would have been less clear two hundred years ago, since practically every nation had an established church, from which it was often difficult for many people to dissent publicly. Nonetheless, it is now clear that secular nations such as Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Belgium are sustained by a national morality at least as strong as any religious nation. These countries have low rates of crime and particularly of violent crime. They have enlightened, compassionate social policies which enjoy the support of the majority of citizens. Their presses are freer and their political systems less corrupt than the average in Europe, let alone worldwide. They conform in every material respect to the founding fathers’ notion of political prosperity.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • A civil law case would most likely include
    9·2 answers
  • One right that has been taken away due to british actions or policies
    12·1 answer
  • Please define the word leisure
    11·2 answers
  • Important writer of federalist papers
    10·1 answer
  • For human beings originally began philosophy, as they do now, because of wonder, at first because they wondered at the strange t
    13·1 answer
  • Description of the Aristocracy government?
    10·1 answer
  • Which one is correct ​
    13·2 answers
  • When a prisoner pleads the Fifth (5th), what does that mean?
    9·2 answers
  • Why did the Democratic Party split in the 1850s?
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements best represents Abraham Lincoln's experience of and views on slavery prior to the Civil War
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!