Since you provide no relevant number,
In order to find out the optimal Asset allocation, you should find out which investment opportunities that Provide the highest return with the lowest standard deviation in the risk department
hope this helps
Answer:
Kyle will have in five years from now 2,501.26 dollars for his investment on certificate of deposit.
Explanation:
We need to calcualte the future value of a lump sum:
Principal $ 2,200
time 5 years
rate 2.6% = 2.6/100 = 0.02600
Amount 2,501.26
Question: The question is incomplete. See the full question below and the answer.
You are an up-and-coming developer in downtown Seattle and are interested in constructing a building on a site you own. You have collected four bids from prospective contractors. The bids include both a cost ($millions) and time to completion (months):
Contractor Cost Time
A 100 20
B 80 25
C 79 28
D 82 26
The problem now is to decide which contractor to choose. B has indicated that for another $20 million, he could do the job in 18 months, and you have said that you would be indifferent between that bid and the original proposal. In talking with C, you have indicated that you would just as soon pay her an extra $million if she could get the job done in 26 months. Who gets the job? Explain your reasoning. (It may be convenient to plot the four alternatives on a graph.)
Answer:
See the explanation for the answer and find attached of the graph.
Explanation:
So we draw a regression line of Time vs Cost and best fit a curve based on the data given, given in the above figure. The four alternatives are marked in the figure as well. Our main objective is to reduce both time and cost, but that might not be possible So the best thing would be to look for alternatives which lie below the line. If C gets an extra million, then that point would come below the regression line, and it would be a better alternative than D, because for the same time we are getting the job done at a cheaper cost.
Also if B is paid extra 20 million, that point also comes below the regression line, and hence will be a better alternative than A because for the same cost again we are getting the job done earlier. We need to choose between B and C. Now in order to optimise both cost and time, we need to choose a point close to the middle point of the regression line segment in 1st quadrant. We see that C is much more closer to the middle point and hence seems like a better option.
So we choose C as our contractor if we consider B's alternative bid, but if we do not consider B's alternative bid and stick to the original one, we choose B as our contractor.
Answer:
The correct answer is variable expense will also be eliminated of the segment which got eliminated.
Explanation:
The segment in the business which is not profitable anymore, then that segment would be eliminated or removed, which will result in net income will always increase or rise. And the variable costs of that eliminated segment will be absorbed through other segments or will be eliminated.
Though the segment is removed, the fixed costs which is allocated to the segment will be covered still.
So, when the segment is eliminated, then the variable expense of that segment would be eliminated.
They must deposit $5,227,272.73 if the trust fund will pay $115,000 per year and the trust fund earns an annual return of 2.2%.
The amount to be deposited today can be considered as the present value that can be described as the current figure of a future sum of money or stream of cash flows provided a specified rate of return.
The amount to be deposited or in other words, the present value can be calculated by using the formula for present value;
PV = Annual cash flow / Interest rate
Substituting the given values of annual cash flow and interest rate in this formula;
PV = $115,000 / 0.022
PV = $5,227,272.73
Therefore, the amount that has to be deposited today by them is calculated to be $5,227,272.73
To learn more about the present value; click here:
brainly.com/question/20813161
#SPJ4