1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
blagie [28]
3 years ago
9

The rights of land owners in eminent domain are protected by the: a. First Amendment. b. Fourth Amendment. c. Fifth Amendment. d

. Fourteenth Amendment.
History
1 answer:
pantera1 [17]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Fifth Amendment

Explanation:

Eminent domain refers to the power of the government to take private property and convert it into public use. However the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution prohibits the government from taking a private property without due compensation to the owner

You might be interested in
The west African trading kingdoms were known to trade gold for what
Vaselesa [24]
Salt 

Camel caravans from North Africa carried bars of salt<span>as well as cloth, tobacco, and metal tools across the Sahara to </span>trading<span> centers like Djenne and Timbuktu on the Niger River. Some items for which the </span>salt<span> was traded include </span>gold<span>, ivory, slaves, skins, kola nuts, pepper, and sugar. 
</span>
hope this helps 
4 0
3 years ago
Winfield Scott's Address To The Cherokee Nation
Fiesta28 [93]

At the end of the first phase of the transfer in August of 1838, 3,000 Cherokees had left Georgia and Tennessee traveling by the river towards Oklahoma; but another 13,000 remained in camps. Due to the intercession of John Ross in Washington, those Cherokees would travel, according to Eisenhower, "by their own means, unarmed, and without supervision by the militia or the regulars.

4 0
3 years ago
Am I the only anime fan on here :&gt;?​
Vanyuwa [196]
I’ve only seen 5 seasons of Naruto, that’s about it and Perfect Blue
3 0
3 years ago
The immediate cause of war in Europe in 1914 was Group of answer choices the sinking of the British passenger liner Lusitania. a
Rudik [331]

Answer:

the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand.

Explanation:

The First World War was started in 1914 and continues up to 1918 with many possible causes and contradictory motivations. Millions of lives have been lost in this confounding war that encroached on the world. Historians have usually considered many approaches to address the complexity of the s origins of the First World War by closely observing global patterns that had evolved over several years. However, the immediate cause for the war was the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in the region both claimed by Austria and Serbia.

6 0
3 years ago
What was the significance of the us Supreme Court decision in Marbury v Madison (1803)
ANEK [815]

<em>Marbury v. Madison</em> was significant because it asserted the Supreme Court's right of judicial review -- the ability to declare a law or executive action unconstitutional.

More detail:

  • Judicial review refers to the courts' ability to review any law to see if it violates any existing law or any statute of a state constitution or the US Constitution.  On the federal level, Marbury v. Madison (1803) is considered the landmark case for the Supreme Court asserting its authority of judicial review, to strike down a law as unconstitutional.
  • It was sort of a roundabout way in which the principle of judicial review was asserted by the Supreme Court in the case of Marbury v. Madison. William Marbury had been appointed Justice of the Peace for the District of Columbia by outgoing president John Adams -- one of a number of such last-minute appointments made by Adams.  When Thomas Jefferson came into office as president, he directed his Secretary of State, James Madison, not to deliver many of the commission papers for appointees such as Marbury.  Marbury petitioned the Supreme Court directly to hear his case, as a provision of the Judiciary Act of 1789 had made possible.  The Court said that particular provision of the Judiciary Act was in conflict with Article III of the Constitution, and so they could not issue a specific ruling in Marbury's case (which they believe he should have won).  Nevertheless, in making their statement about the case, the Court established the principle of judicial review.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Monsoons kill hundreds every year in bangladesh. why are the camps even more dangerous than surrounding areas?
    5·1 answer
  • Which Swiss reformer was killed in battle A: John wycliffe B: Ulrich zwingli C: John Knox D: Martin Luther
    6·2 answers
  • Why were Loyalists willing to support continued British rule but Patriots were not?
    9·1 answer
  • Why did Tecumseh bring together many American Indian tribes?
    15·2 answers
  • Which brutal roman emperor is said to have been playing a lyre and singing while rome burned during the great fire of rome in 64
    8·1 answer
  • What kinds of differences do you think existed between a colony dominated by Puritans and a colony dominated by planters?
    7·1 answer
  • What were new technologies in farming
    5·1 answer
  • The old adage politics stops at the water’s edge means that
    9·1 answer
  • Will Mark Brainliest !!
    12·2 answers
  • Before I get banned from Brainly lol wanna have fun? You should do my fun quiz. Yes you can trust the link its not a virus. Its
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!