Answer:
D. $98.15
Explanation:
Price of stock formula;
Price today(P0) = 
D0= Current dividend
g = growth rate
r = required return
Price = 
= 3.762 /0.065
Price = 57.877
Price in 12 years (P12) = P0(1+g)
P12 = 57.877 *
P12 =$98.152
Therefore, price of stock in 12 years will be $98.15
The law of Diminishing returns states that as successive units of a variable resource are added to a fixed resource, beyond some point, the marginal product will decline.
<h3>What is the
law of Diminishing returns?</h3>
The law of diminishing returns explains that when an investment in a particular area increases there will be a stop at the rate of profit from that investment, after a certain point.
Learn more about the law of Diminishing returns at brainly.com/question/17169713
#SPJ1
Answer:
a. $1.2800
Explanation:
The AUD/SF cross exchange rate is as computed below:
==> AUD/$ ÷ SF/$
==> $1.60 / $1.25
==> $1.2800
So, the AUD/SF cross exchange rate is $1.2800
Answer:
a. One spatial change in manufacturing employment patterns as a result of deindustrialization is production shift.
b. Companies may move their industrial activities and manufacturing jobs to areas with a lower cost of labor.
c. Some natural places could be deemed unfit for humans.
d. Facilitating the construction of railroads, bridges, tall buildings, larger ships, and other infrastructure, Powering service-sector industries such as information technology, financial services, retail, and education, all of which depend on the processing power and connectivity brought about by the computer chip.
e. A growth pole is significant to an urban economy as it will attract supporting businesses such as retail establishments, restaurants, and other service industries to the city or urban area on a local scale.
f. Post-fordism methods of production have transformed operation at individual factories by instead of workers working only one task all day and not being able to perform other tasks in the factory the workerscould now work multiple tasks and were not concealed to one specific area of work, this also made the workers more appealing to other factories and made it to where they could work other positions for more money and could not be so easily concealed for one spot.
Explanation:
A+
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
The Desses would have had a stronger argument if the contract was silent in this way because it would have been less likely that there was a designated class of third-party beneficiaries under the contract.
Cheers
