Answer:
The consumer's level of involvement can lead to two types of buying decisions: limited problem solving or extended problem solving
Explanation:
limited problem solving:
It is a problem solving process in which customer is only willing to put very little effort to make a purchase decision in order to fulfill his want or need. Purchaser uses simple decision rules for reaching a a purchase decision with minimal research done. He is not much concerned about the best solution and has limited resources and time for searching information and assessing each alternative thoroughly.
For example: you need a new pair of joggers for gym. You are already have an idea about joggers and know about new available materials and attributes. So you might do a bit research online and come to a decision comparatively quickly. You might consider your favorite outlet instead of searching for the joggers at every outlet. So you take buying decision limiting involvement in this process.
extended problem solving
In this process the costumer attempts to collect as much information as possible, and thoroughly assess and evaluate product alternatives. So in this situation buyer don't have much idea about the product brands, attributes and characteristics to access the product. Purchaser will research, differentiate and put a lot of effort for taking best buying decision that will fulfill his needs. prior to purchasing the product, he might visit various outlets, research online, search for reviews and suggestions, take information from outlet staff. about the product Marketer should provide with such information to customer.
For example high value items like car, a house etc. Such items are not purchased often so the consumer will invest a lot of time in research and comparison in order to take the best decision.
<span>The question is incomplete, here is the complete question which I previously came across;</span>
When Janice went to work as a hair stylist in Rick's beauty shop, she entered into an agreement with Rick, whereby, if she left she would not work for another beauty shop within 50 miles for 2 years. Rick trained Janice in a number of new techniques. After nine months, Janice was offered a great job down the street at a new beauty shop, quit Rick, and had a number of customers follow her down the street to her new job. Rick claimed that she had signed a contract and had no right to go to work at the new shop. Janice disagreed and told Rick that no judge in the country would enforce such an agreement. Janice told Rick that she was more worried about a customer, Treena, who was threatening to sue her because her hair turned green after Janice worked on it. Janice agreed that Treena's hair was damaged. Janice pointed out, however, that she told Treena that odd results could result from a dye attempt, and she required that Treena sign a contract releasing Janice from all liabilities before she did anything with Treena's hair. Treena, however, sued anyway. The agreement Rick and Janice entered into is referred to as?
The answer is, the agreement Rick and Janice entered into is referred to as "<span>covenant not to compete".</span>
<span>
</span>
It is hard
to decide if a judge will implement a non-competition agreement. While the privileged insights of a business are important,
the law additionally puts value to a person's opportunity to seek after other
work. To be enforceable Courts more often than not require that a contract not
to compete be sensible. In California, non-competes are adequately unlawful
except if you are selling a business. Different states will implement a few provisions,
as a rule the trade secret protection, however not the work limitations.
Answer:
The answer to this question can be described as follows:
Explanation:
The economy scale with cost activity and total volumes of sales, which lowers the overall product prices as a result, and grows all economies of scale, because consumers purchase the stuff like those, who pay even less than the amount they expect to receive.
It is the transition, the same saved money it's spent on other commodities and the overall deficit as well as the actual boosting of financial social assistance that generates income as a whole. It also increases outlays and creates more jobs, and benefits people with higher median income levels and a decent standard of living, For example
Uber often encourages ride-sharing, in which the car is capable of serving 3-4 people simultaneously. This gives a win-win situation to all sides and generates economies of scale. Throughout the market like India, Uber already is introducing it and being extremely successful.
Well, it is strongly suggested by your point of view. However, considering the alternatives I will assume that you are after potensiell positive effects.
I would first and firemost mention Job creation as a effect. This is due to new productive and innovative perspective which priarily focus on expanding the financial capital; in this way provide facilities and cultivate nationalism.
Answer:
The correct answer is option C.
Explanation:
`If firms can easily enter and exit the market, then firms operating in the market will earn zero economic profit in the long run. This is because the short run is too short for firms to enter and exit so potential firms will enter and exit in the long run.
If the existing firms will be having negative profits, the firms having loss will exit the market. This will reduce market supply. As a result, the price level will increase. This will go on until all firms will have zero economic profits.
Similarly, if the existing firms are having positive economic profits in the long run, the other firms will enter the market. This will increase the market supply such that the price level decreases. This will go on till all the firms will be having zero economic profits.
