Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
It is true that under the all-events test, in addition to specifying that all events to establish the liability must have occurred, the test also provides that the business must be able to determine the amount of the liability with reasonable accuracy
Under Sec. 461(h), a three-prongall-events test is met when
(1) all events have occurred that establish the fact of the liability;
(2) <u>the amount of the liability can be determined with reasonable accuracy</u>; and
(3) economic performance has occurred.
Answer:
D. Smith is incorrect, because Benson paid part of the purchase price and took possession.
Explanation:
Since in the question, there is a contract between the Smith and Benson for the sale of land but after paying the $400,000 the Benson takes the land possession. but according to the Smith it is an unenforceable contract under the statute of frauds.
So as Benson pay the amount of $400,000 and take the possession so in this case the Simon is incorrect
Hence, the option d is correct
Answer:
425,000
Explanation:
I'm not sure I just added the two together?
Answer:
r = 11.55%
Explanation:
Given that,
Annual dividend paid last week, D1 = $2.50
Dividend growth rate, g = 8%
current price of common stock = $76
Stock price = D1 ÷ (r - g)
$76 = [$2.50 × (1 + 8%)] ÷ (r - 8%)
$76 = 2.7 ÷ (r - 8%)
(r - 8%) = 0.0355
r = 0.0355 + 0.08
= 0.1155 × 100
= 11.55%
Therefore,
Return, r = 11.55%
