Hey there,
Your correct answer would be B.)<span>Women are often punished for committing criminal acts that are pardoned when committed by men.
Women were not often treated the right way, which is wrong of course, but that's what they did.
~Jurgen</span>
Soviet Union (now known as Russia) I’m pretty sure
Due to the fact that both documents B and C offer evidence for Bernstein's argument, the most accurate historical account of social security is Bernstein. All the things that Bernstein stated is backed up by the NAACP reps as well as the woman. The NAACP reps showed that black people were left out of the program and the woman was able to prove that she, too, got no help from the program. Degler's statement was far too over exaggerated.
When a country is governed by an absolute <u>monarch who has not been elected, such goverment violates the social contract principle</u> that states that the power of a country resides on its citizens who can grant it to political representatives elected through suffrage and would propose and implement policies on their behalf.
On the other hand, it is not guaranteed that a monarch that has not been elected, would govern taking into account the interests and needs of his citizens, as there is not any manner of withdrawing him from such power position.
