1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tiny-mole [99]
3 years ago
10

According to Article 3, explain both sides of Shays' Rebellion. Include perspectives of the political leaders and the leaders of

the rebellion.
History
2 answers:
Marina CMI [18]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Explanation: The Shays insurgents claimed they were fighting for liberty as they did in the Revolution while the governor and other political leaders saw it as tyranny. The political leaders saw this as a threat to government and to the security of life and liberty. Additionally, there were former veterans fighting on both sides. Thomas Jefferson, while away in France, thought that "a little rebellion now and then is a good thing". He thought it was necessary for the health of the government. (Actual answer)

Schach [20]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

According to article 3 the shays insurgents were fighting for liberty and also because they were not given proper compensation which lead to a large scale of them falling into poverty after fighting in the revolutionary wars. while the political leaders saw this as dangerous to Government,security of  life and liberty.The Rebellion leaders like Thomas Jefferson an  ex-Revolutionary  war veteran on the side of the rebellion thought  that 'a little rebellion here and there' is good for the Government to be healthy

Explanation:

shays' Rebellion was a series of attacks on court houses and Government properties in Massachusetts that began in 1786 before becoming a full blown military confrontation in 1787 the rebels where mostly ex-Revolutionary war soldiers that became farmers after the war. the rebellion was named after Daniel shays one of the leaders of the Rebellion

You might be interested in
Which are abiotic parts of an ecosystem?
Nata [24]
Which are abiotic parts of an ecosystem

In the ecosystem, there are a handful of abiotic and biotic factors that affect living organisms and the whole functioning of the ecosystem. Examples of biotic factors that influences the way the ecosystem function include animals, trees, bacteria, plants, moss and grass. In general, biotic parts of an ecosystem comprise of all living components and are usually sorted into three categories which include autotrophs, consumers and decomposers also known as detritivores.  On the other hand, abiotic parts of the ecosystem include things that are not alive but affect how the ecosystem functions. Examples of abiotic parts of an ecosystem include things such as air, soil, stone, gases, rocks, climate, humidity, temperature, nutrients, sunlight, temperature and nonliving things. In our case, the listed things that make up the abiotic part of the ecosystem include soil, air, water and dead organic matter.




5 0
3 years ago
Many historians consider the James K. Polk presidency to be considerably aggressive and/or controversial. How do you rate the pr
Maurinko [17]

James K Polk is one of the historical figures that is really hard to judge by modern standards.

He was a forceful man with strongly held beliefs. He was the last in the line of "Jacksonian Presidents" with all of the baggage that came along with that.

Ultimately, he was a strong war time President. His single term in office led to the short lived Presidency of Zachary Taylor, who was significantly less informed and forceful than Polk. After Polk, the issue of slavery really came to the forefront. Polk was either responsible for delaying the prominence of this issue or just got lucky. It is likely that history would look much differently if Polk had a second term and continued his aggressive posture towards America's future.

I'd say he was a good President, for his time, who strongly acted on the economy and in regards to Mexico but whose record looks abysmal by modern standards and values.



5 0
3 years ago
OK MY LAS QUESTION I NEED AN LEGIT ANSWER PLS
Amiraneli [1.4K]
Answer

In 538 BCE King Cyrus made a public declaration granting the Jews the right to return to Judah and rebuild the Temple in Jerusalem. In the year 586 BCE, King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylonia conquered the city of Jerusalem, destroyed the Temple and sent many of the inhabitants of Judah into exile

hope this helps and have a wonderful day :)
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did British troops march to Concord?
son4ous [18]
Having already learned of the orders, colonial leaders fled Boston to avoid arrest. Gage decided to seize and destroy arms the patriots had stored at Concord<span>, 20 miles northwest of Boston. On the night of April 18, 1775, 700 </span>British soldiers<span>began to </span>march<span> toward </span>Concord<span>.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is one reason historians can rely on government records for accurate historical information?
Leokris [45]

Answer:

Historians work to understand the circumstances of those living in the historical time period.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The proposed State of Sequoyah was named after the Cherokee who __________.
    11·2 answers
  • Help!!
    13·1 answer
  • SOS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Which is NOT an accurate description of the West African kingdom of Songhai?
    8·2 answers
  • 2. Who did George Bush lose to in the 1992 election?
    15·2 answers
  • Who explored enough of south America to deem it a new continent
    6·1 answer
  • Who was the 1 president
    11·1 answer
  • Did the guarantee of "mutual destruction" keep the two superpowers from using their arsenals?
    14·1 answer
  • Will give brainiest to whoever gives me the correct answer
    9·1 answer
  • Https://brainly.com/
    11·2 answers
  • How did Frederick Taylor improve the speed of production to 200 cars a day?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!