She visited friar Laurence for advice on what to do about marrying Paris because she knows that she is in love with Romeo. She went to Friar to work out a way to get out of marrying Paris and wether that was the right thing to do or not. To see Paris with no intention to marry him when that was what he was talking about doing is very ironic. Paris says to Juliet he's happy to meet her ' my wife'. Juliet replies by saying 'that may be sir, when I may be a wife' which suggests she isn't classing herself as his wife yet as deep down she doesn't have any intention in marrying him. Visiting Friar was a way for Juliet to try and escape from something she doesn't want to do to only be confronted with the situation by being called the only thing she doesn't want to be called; his wife. Shakespeare did this to create a dramatic irony in Juliets situation and create a tense atmosphere for the reader not knowing how Juliet is going to react or possibly have her feelings change once speaking to her arranged husband. this creates suspense and keeps the reader intrigued in the story.
Rebecca Saxe and her colleagues conducted an experiment on morals and social habits. The most important conclusions are the following:
When people gather in large groups, there is a possibility that both good and bad things may happen. Although a group may have good intentions (on social, political, or other aspects), there is always a possibility that this group may harm those outside the group.
Saxe states that a person individually can express a certain morality and values but, when being in a group, those could be set aside. The individual could even end up doing things that contradict what he/she personally thinks. This can be explained because in this group, the individual experiences anonymity and feels no need to take responsibility for the group’s actions.
The hypothesis of the research argues that when an individual enters a group, they can be ignore their individual and moral beliefs, being prone to participate in activities that they might consider arguable if they were not part of it.
The fourth option because the way the author is ending the paragraph seems like they are saying that the industrial revolution will have unknown consequences. (Said the seventh grader lol)
A good logical prediction is something big might happen, maybe a volcano eruption, or maybe something is chasing them (besides). Lost is terrible, they could get eaten.. They might be getting hunted by a hungry tiger.
So A doesn’t really go with it so you can rule that out. The main character doesn’t get introduced can you can rule out D too. It’s between B and C. I honestly would go with C the author sets up the hook of the story.
