Hmm, a strong argument typically includes a statement of one's own opinion, then your opponent's counterclaim, and reasons why the counterclaim is inaccurate or invalid. For instance, Tammy could have started off with a statement about how animal safety benefits the animals, and then address the counterclaim about it being expensive by stating it doesn't just help the animals, but the people as well. I think the answer here is false because Tammy's speech didn't include an argument about how expensive animal safety is. So false. I hope this helps, sorry it's so long.
Where is the question then?
Answer:
Parallelism
Explanation:
The given excerpt is an example of parallelism.
Parallelism (also known as parallel structure or parallel construction) is a figure of speech in which phrases in a sentence are grammatically the same or similar in construction, sound, meaning, or meter. The purpose of parallelism is to give balance, clarity, pattern, or rhythm.
In the second sentence of the excerpt, we have several repetitions:
- <u>There was </u>no hurry, for <u>there was</u> nowhere to go. (there + past simple tense + negation)
- ... nowhere <u>to go</u>, nothing <u>to buy</u> and no money <u>to buy</u> it with, nothing<u> to see</u> outside the boundaries of Maycomb County. (negation + infinitive)
- ... <u>nothing to buy</u> and no money to buy it with, <u>nothing to see</u> outside the boundaries of Maycomb County. (a part of the repetition I previously pointed out - nothing + infinitive).
Answer:
This shows that Charlie is developing his perception of emotions, which is totally different from what he was able to do before.
Explanation:
The excerpt presented in the question above can be found in the book "Flowers to Algernon" where we know the character Charlie, who has a mental disability that does not allow him to have a good cognitive and rational capacity. However, Charlie undergoes surgery that lessens the mental disability he has, causing him to undergo gradual changes during the story.
In the excerpt shown in the question above, we can see one of these gradual changes. That's because Charlie was unable to interpret the emotions he had towards other people, but now he can understand that Alice Kinnian pleases him and that it provokes positive emotions for him.
Answer:
Personification
Explanation:
the author is referring to death as a character, which it is not
