Answer:
Steve has no legal recourse against Jonathan but he can try to take action against Knell Watches.
Explanation:
The entrustment rule says that entrusting goods to a seller who deals in goods of that kind, gives that seller the power to transfer those goods and all rights to a buyer in the ordinary course of business. Entrusting includes giving your goods to the seller and leaving goods that have already been bought with the seller, with the intention of picking the goods up or having them delivered at a later stage.
Here Steve cannot claim back his watch from Jonathan because he gave the watch to Knell Watches willingly. Jonathan also bought the watch from Kevin in good faith, he had no idea that the watch had been stolen from Knell. Kevin sold the watch to him in good faith and he had no reason to doubt that the watch really belonged to Kevin because they are friends. if, however, someone else had taken the watch in to Knell Watches on behalf of Steve, then he would be able to get the watch back from Jonathan but he can't now because he took the watch in himself. Knell was also deceived by Kevin and so Jonathan is protected because of that according to Uniform Commercial Code.
<u>Answer:
</u>
Laws may display behavior that some feel is wrong, and it may act that some feel is right is a TRUE statement.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- Certain laws are subject to criticism owing to the unacceptability of some or all the provisions included in it.
- In some instances, some laws tend to favor a specific group of people over others. Such laws are deemed as good by the ones who the law favors and is criticized by the ones who the law does not favor.
Answer:
The correct answer is Obliteration
Explanation:
Obliteration means eradication, erasure.
Something that is obliterated means that it is gone.
In sociology, the word obliteration can take many connotations, one of them being cultural obliteration.
Cultural obliteration usually occurs when a person moves to a country that has a cultural context that they are not used to but end up adapting said culture. What happens with their original cultural identity is known as Obliteration. It can also happen when a person adopts their partners' cultural identity while sacrificing their own.
In this particular case, Keiko grew in Japan and Wahid in Egypt.
They got married in the United States and they decided to stay there and "become American" rather than negotiate the differences between their two cultures. This scenario exemplifies obliteration.
When Steve and Kathy divorced, they agreed to share the responsibility for the care and raising of their children. In the context of child custody, this arrangement exemplifies joint custody.
What is joint custody?
Sharing of parental responsibilities for the child is included in joint custody. Joint custody involves both parents actively participating in the child's upbringing, as opposed to exclusive custody, when one parent has complete control. Physical and legal custody might be shared equally, as well as both.
What are the disadvantages of joint custody?
Youngsters can experience alienation and confusion because they are frequently in a condition of limbo and are continually moving between their parents' homes. Additionally, keeping up two homes for the child's needs is frequently very difficult for parents.
Learn more about Joint Custody: brainly.com/question/9117788
#SPJ4
The main reason why United States was involved in Vietnam is that the United States believed in the so called Domino effect: that if one country becomes communist, others might become communist too. So they got involved to stop the spread of communism (option a)
