In the Boston Consulting Group growth-share matrix, each of the four categories in the matrix represents a different investment strategy
More about growth-share matrix:
The growth share matrix was developed through teamwork. It was initially drafted by BCG's Alan Zakon, who would later go on to become the company's CEO, and then improved with his colleagues.
Bruce Henderson, the creator of BCG, popularised the idea in his 1970 essay The Product Portfolio. About half of all Fortune 500 businesses employed the growth share matrix when it was at its most successful.
It continues to be a key component of corporate strategy lessons taught in business schools today.
Learn more about growth-share here:
brainly.com/question/26425181
#SPJ4
Answer: Demonstration
Explanation:
informational presentation typically occurs in organizations and it's when information are being presented to the audience.
Since Frank will walks a focus group through the steps that are involved in setting up and using the platform, then the type of informative presentation that Frank is giving is demonstration.
If a schedule c taxpayer does not bring the documents to prove the income, one cannot claim the Earned Income Tax Credit. Also the return cannot be prepared by the tax professional however one can make a form 1099 MISC to indicate their own income and lastly they should give other proofs that the income is accurate so that the paper for return can have the sign needed.
Answer:
<u>The effect of government regulation on a monopolist's production decisions</u>
Explanation:
The effect of a large government budget deficit on the economy's price level
The superavit or deficit of the government is a macroeconomics subject.
The money market is also macroeconomics.
The impact of regulation or specifit taxes or tax extemption on a monopolist's production will be part of microecnomics, because it will impact on which level the monopolist's production finds equilibrium after the legislation.
Answer:
It is more profitable to sell te products as-is.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Sell as-is:
Selling price= $31
Continue processing:
Selling price= $35
Unitary incremental cost= $8
Units= 6,100
<u>The firsts $5,200 is a sunk cost, this means that the cost will remain the same in both options. It is irrelevant to the decision-making process.</u>
Sell as-is:
Effect on income= 6,100*31= $189,100
Continue processing:
Effect on income= 6,100*(35-8)= $164,700
It is more profitable to sell te products as-is.
