1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Delicious77 [7]
3 years ago
15

One of your hallmates, Ling, is an exchange student from Taiwan. Ling never goes out with the other students, goes to bed at 9:3

0 every night, and studies quietly in her room most of the time. You assume that Ling behaves the way she does because she is Asian. Which of the following attribution errors might you have committed? Group of answer choices
- self-serving bias
- fundamental attribution error
- overattribution
- all of these
Social Studies
1 answer:
Jlenok [28]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Over-attribution            

Explanation:

Attribution, in social psychology, is defined as the process through which an individual describes the causes of events and behavior and be classified as either external or internal. An internal attribution, an individual describes that a particular event is caused due to personal characteristics like feelings, abilities, and genetic traits.

Example: The self-serving bias.

Henceforth, the over-attribution bias takes place when a person attributes the human behavior or tendency to any causal factor which is most available to the person at any given point.

Also known as the correspondence bias.

You might be interested in
Help MEEE with this please i need help illl give u brainliest please help me....
larisa86 [58]

1: A

2: D...the US was a supporter of Democracy while the Soviet Union supported communism.

3: A is the correct answer. The Soviet Union was not able to keep up and its economy hollowed out.

4. D. At Camp David, Carter tried to forge a peace.

4 0
3 years ago
A moral ____, or obligation, is something that ought to be done (or not done) and that we are bound to do it (or not do it).
Ivenika [448]

A moral <u>duty</u>, or obligation, is something that ought to be done and that we are bound to do it.

A moral duty is a duty based on morality or ethics. People are not legally bound to study ethical obligations. In different phrases, moral duty has no relation to the law. If a person does not perform these obligations, they can't be punished via the law. ethical obligations depend in particular on someone's sense of right and wrong.

As per the Theory of Legal Obligation, to be legally obligated not to do some action is just for it to be the case that, from the legal point of view, the reasons not to do this action defeat any motives for me to do it.

Kant answers that we do our moral duty whilst our motive is decided by means of a precept recognized via cause in place of the choice for any predicted consequence or emotional feeling which might also reason us to behave the way we do.

Learn more about ethics here brainly.com/question/24606527

#SPJ1

3 0
2 years ago
A park ranger has decided to prohibit visitors to their state park from picking wildflowers because too many people were picking
DochEvi [55]

The name of the concept from the text which the ranger is trying to prevent with this prohibition is called:

  • <u>A tragedy of the commons</u>

According to the given question, we are asked to state the name of the concept from the text which the ranger is trying to prevent with this prohibition.

As a result of this, we can see that the park ranger is trying to stop visitors from entering the state park and pick up wildflowers because people were <em>picking too much </em>and causing damage.

With this in mind, we can see that he was <em>trying to prevent</em> a tragedy of the commons where <em>one thing is damaged</em> because of lots of usage where there is not enough replacement.

Read more here:

brainly.com/question/19882646

4 0
3 years ago
What do these headlines say about how the Supreme Court has addressed the principle of equality on which the united States was f
tigry1 [53]

The answer is: They showed that the court has enforced equal rights for a variety of groups that have been discriminated against.

Prior to the civil rights act, the supreme court openly discriminate their decisions against minorities.

To justify their actions, the highlight how the constitution only intended to support 'citizens' while the minorities at that time were not considered to be one. They started to change their opinion regarding this issue after several headlines were made by journalists to address their decisions.

5 0
3 years ago
What are some examples that illustrate the collective unconscious of Italian culture?
Alchen [17]
It's a me(me) .........................

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why was petrarch important?
    5·1 answer
  • Which is the correct order of development of six motor milestones, according to research?
    7·2 answers
  • Setting aside Social Security and Medicare, other entitlement programs in the U.S. government ________.
    6·1 answer
  • Mr. Anderson suffers from Parkinson's disease and his shaking arm movements are so severe that he has difficulty feeding or dres
    13·1 answer
  • Three distinctive features of the Australian ballot are:
    9·2 answers
  • The nurse is teaching the student nurse how to perform a physical assessment based on the child's developmental stage. Which sta
    12·1 answer
  • Preston described to Mr. Harlos how Maria had gotten the cut on her knee when she was running. All of the students listening car
    7·1 answer
  • What effect does Douglass’s use of the words “mangled” and “emaciated” have on the reader?
    7·2 answers
  • 55. Jen wishes to take a vacation in a few months that costs more than her monthly paycheck will allow. What would be the safest
    14·1 answer
  • What finally led to the end of slavery in the United States?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!