In <em>Mapp v. Ohio</em>, the Supreme Court ruled <u>B. If the police</u> violate the law to obtain evidence, they cannot use that evidence against an accused person in court.
<h3>What was the place of evidence in the case of Mapp v. Ohio?</h3>
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled against the state in a 5-3 vote, favoring Mapp, from whom evidence was obtained without due process.
The implication is that evidence seized unlawfully from a suspect or an accused, without a search warrant, could not be used in criminal prosecutions in state courts.
Thus, in <em>Mapp v. Ohio</em>, the Supreme Court ruled <u>B. If the police</u> violate the law to obtain evidence, they cannot use that evidence against an accused person in court.
Learn more about the importance of evidence in criminal prosecutions at brainly.com/question/7802791
#SPJ1
The major event that happened in the United States on September 11, 2001 was called the 9/11. The 9/11 had 11 attacks caused by terrorists. There were even suicide attacks. And in the end, a total of 2,977 people were killed in New York City, Washington, D.C., and Shanksville, Pennsylvania, in the most terrible terrorist attack in U.S. history.
Hope I helped!
- Debbie
Answer:
No, a new state law overrules a federal law is not permitted. According to the constitution the law made under the authority of the United States , shall be the supreme law of the land. As a result of this all federal laws overrules the state laws, judges in every state are bound by the federal laws irrespective of what the state laws state. The federal government can pass laws that affect every state, state government obey treaties signed by the federal government and any new federal law will force the state to change Its existing laws.
Explanation:
Answer:
. The widespread adoption of firearms by states in the Middle East and Western Europ
Explanation:
The correct answer is
<span>A great distance geographically separated colonists and Britain
They spoke the same language - English. The religious beliefs were mostly the same, but the colonies had more diversity in their Christianity while the English were predominantly protestant. The colonists didn't ally themselves with the natives.</span>
