Answer:
the similarities for legislative and judicaial are that they both involve the congress
Explanation:
A strict constructionist is a person who believes that the u.s. constitution should not be amended by judges and that judges should adhere closely to the document's text.
A strict constructionist is the one who believes that the wording of the Constitution is incomprehensible and that the words of the Constitution should be interpreted literally. This philosophy is usually associated with federal jurisdiction when it involves constitutional issues. A strict constructionist usually specifies to a judge who interprets the constitution exactly as it is written. Anyone can be a strict constructionist, but the term best applies to those with political power.
Know more about a strict constructionist here
brainly.com/question/13594866
#SPJ4
The native Americans already had the first 3 items. The British brought horses to the new world and the native Americans used them a good bit Civil War and after.
Answer:
The correct option is B) A purposive incentive
Explanation:
Incentives can be described as rewards given to person due yo their outstanding work.
A purposive incentive can be described as a cause which is served by a person who is passionate about the action or event.
In the scenario discussed in the question, Brandon is contributing to the environmental work because he is an environmentalist and gets satisfaction by doing it. This, itself is a reward. Hence, the scenario is example of purposive incentive.
