The "special items" that each astronaut was allowed to carry was called a "Personal Preference Kit" in the jargon of NASA. Every item had to be approved by NASA to make sure the total weight was within limits and also it wouldn't outgas any solvents or be flammable in a pure oxygen atmosphere or pose any sort of danger to the mission. According to this thread on Neil Armstrong's Apollo personal preference kits, he never really enumerated the items - when asked to for a biography, he said he couldn't find a manifest. However, at that time he recalled
<span>
Some Apollo 11 medallions,Gold olive branch jewelry for his wife and mothera piece of wood and fabric from the Wright Flyera college fraternity pin</span>
And then at other times it has come out that he also carried:
<span>
A pennant from an Argentine soccer team (? I don't know if that's ever been explained why)A scout badge<span>
A 20 Franc coin and necklace</span></span>
Answer:
I can't see the map I can help you once I see it tho
The expanded role of government has brought about significant changes in our economic system. the federal government in any ways small or big, pervades our lives. taxes at all levels of government take more than one quarterof our national production and are levied most heavily on work, enterprise, and capital accumulation.
Answer:
Federalism
Explanation:
Federalism may be defined as the mixed form of the government or compound form which combines the general government with the regional government in single political system.
It is the system of government where the power is being divided between national government and the other states' government. It is opposite to the unitary form of government.
Thus federalism describes the preservation of some powers of the states but relegation of other power to the national government.
Answer:
The correct answer would be, Hostile Attribution Bias.
Explanation:
Peter's aggressive reaction was due to the Hostile Attribution Bias.
Hostile Attribution Bias is the tendency to interpret others behaviors as having hostile intent, even if the behavior is ambiguous or is not intended to hit someone.
In such type of behaviors, people assume that the other person is hitting them indirectly and in most situations it is not the case.
So in this example given in the question, Peter fought with the girl sitting next to him in the bus because he heard the girl saying in the school to someone that, 'stupid kids in school', and Peter thought that the girl was pointing him indirectly. so he illustrated the Hostile Attribution Bias.
