I would like to compare these two interpretations of The Crucible: 1) Eric Christ's interpretation and Wade Bradford's interpretation. The main differences between there interpretation are that in the first one you can notice a direct link to Joseph McCarthy whereas the second one represents how the town is filled with hysteria. The second interpretation shows that author believes that the story about a Puritan town in Salem is based on actual events while the first example shows the sensible reference to sort of bias.Hope that helps!
Read more on Brainly.com -
brainly.com/question/2785242#readmore
Answer:
Aristotle in the one. I find his observations about the world to be far more in line with what we know within science than those of Plato and I believe that Plato’s idea of perfect forms has no real evidence or even logical basis. In my mind, Plato’s argument for perfect forms is less of an argument and more of a baseless assertion. Now, I do find Plato to be correct as well in many other regards, such as political philosophy, but I agree far more with the philosophical viewpoint of Aristotle overall
In the Bible, God's people are described as being Jews. Although in the modern day, we believe that everybody can be "accepted" into Heaven...by repenting (turning back.) So the answer is either B or D. :)
Answer: C
Explanation:
Achieving Equality for African Americans
Answer:
Christopher Columbus discovered America
