Answer:
The piece of evidence that would best support the claim that "all new territories to the US should decide for themselves whether they will be slave or free" is the Compromise of 1850, that established the precedent that new territories would choose for themselves whether to be slave or free.
Explanation:
The Compromise of 1850 was an agreement between the different states of the United States regarding the status with which the different territories obtained after the war with Mexico would enter the Union. The question was whether these states would be free or slave, and how this would affect the balance between the two groups of states in Congress. Finally, through this agreement California was admitted as a free state, while Utah and New Mexico could define their status through popular sovereignty. The most important part of this agreement was the acceptance of popular sovereignty as the defining method of determining the status of the states against slavery. This would be applied again after the sanction of the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which would lead to a prelude to the Civil War in the event known as Bleeding Kansas.
The Taj Mahal was built with influences from Mughal and Turkish architectural styles.
Rth America can be divided into five physical regions: the ... The temperate rain forest supports a wide variety of life. ... The Canadian Shield is characterized by a rocky landscape pocked by an ...
For sure:
<span>provides Goods are free to move across borders and boost economies.
</span><span>Consumers have access to a wider range of better quality products.
</span><span>The unified countries share military responsibilities. (The EU today mostly hold together when it is under attack (under the NATO) and generally back each other up when in a crisis (as seen when Russia makes threats, or under terrorist attack)
Not so sure:
</span><span>Provides economic benefits (i guess since they are trading, and so economy is boosted)
</span><span>Companies are able to spead across EU countries. (new companies can most likely move to different areas without as much restrictions as say, a company from China to Britain)
</span><span>
Most likely not:
</span>Citizens may live where they like, and boost the labor pool. (just because they are part of the EU, doesn't mean all of europe is together in one nation. They are still different nations within the EU)
hope this helps
North Vietnam (aka communist Vietnam) gaining control of the government, and caused American troops to leave Vietnam
