After reading the video transcript we can say Dr. X is convincing because he supports his explanation with facts, as stated in option B and explained below.
<h3>Why is Dr. X effective and convincing?</h3>
In the video "Dr. X and the Quest for Food Safety," Dr. X is effective at communicating the dangers of cross contamination. The reason for that is the fact that he supports his explanation with facts, that is, he provides evidence that proves his explanation right.
With the information above in mind, we can say Dr. X is convincing when he talks about how bacteria function and what can be done to prevent contamination. Option B is the correct answer.
The complete question with the answer choices can be found attached.
Learn more about food safety here:
brainly.com/question/934835
#SPJ1
"After many years of inner turmoil, the nation of China was united once again under the Ming Dynasty. European ships also had arrived, exposing China to another culture's influence"
The inference is that the speaker's rhetorical question in paragraph 2 supports the purpose of the speech as C. It reinforces the idea that voluntourism can harm the people and communities it is meant to help.
<h3>What is an inference?</h3>
It should be noted that the inference simply means the conclusion that can be deduced based on the information that is given by the author in a story.
In the story, most would agree that volunteering in general is a worthy use of time.
It was important to reinforce the idea that voluntourism can harm the people and communities it is meant to help. This illustrated the use of the rhetorical questions.
In conclusion, the correct option is C.
Learn more about inference on:
brainly.com/question/25280941
#SPJ1
Scout, I’ve never read the book or seen the movie but I’ve heard of it so many times.
