Which experiment method is important for controlling bias ?

Social Studies

1 answer:

IRINA_888 [86]3 years ago

7 0

The answer is C. Because if you let them pick their group it will be their opinion so it will be biased.And the other two wouldnt help at all.Therefore C is the answer Good luck :)

You might be interested in

True or false? At the end of a good onboarding program, the newly hired salesperson will know everything they’ll need to know in

stich3 [128]

Answer:

FALSE

Explanation:

Onboarding programs are designed to welcome and guide newly hired employees in way that will acclimate them to the new role. The employee is, of course, expected to possess certain qualities and skills already, which will not be further developed by the onboarding program. They will, however, be taught some new skills, behaviors, and knowledge to work more effectively according to the company's expectations. It would be impossible for an onboarding program to teach a newly hired employee, such as a salesperson, everything they need to know. There is knowledge and behaviors that can only be developed and acquired while at work, dealing with real situations and issues.

8 0

3 years ago

These group of people were great seafarers, who spread their culture.

Furkat [3]

Answer:

Minoans

a seafaring and trading people that lived on the island of Crete from about 2000 to 1400 BC

Explanation:

brailist

7 0

2 years ago

HELP 50 POINTS! On the subject of humanity in the case of David Sharp, make a statement or comment. What do you think or feel? W

xxTIMURxx [149]

<h2><em><u>Answer: can u pls mark me brainliest and i hope u no this answer is not 50 pnts ok its 25</u></em></h2><h2><em><u>Human nature is a bundle of characteristics, including ways of thinking, feeling, and acting, which humans are said to have naturally.[1][2][3][4] The term is often regarded as capturing what it is to be human, or the essence of humanity. The term is controversial because it is disputed whether or not such an essence exists. Arguments about human nature have been a mainstay of philosophy for centuries and the concept continues to provoke lively philosophical debate.[5][6][7] The concept also continues to play a role in science, with neuroscientists, psychologists and social scientists sometimes claiming that their results have yielded insight into human nature.[8][9][10][11] Human nature is traditionally contrasted with characteristics that vary among humans, such as characteristics associated with specific cultures. Debates about human nature are related to, although not the same as, debates about the comparative importance of genes and environment in development ("nature versus nurture"). </u></em></h2><h2><em><u> </u></em></h2><h2><em><u>The concept of nature as a standard by which to make judgments is traditionally said to have begun in Greek philosophy, at least as regards the Western and Middle Eastern languages and perspectives which are heavily influenced by it.[12] </u></em></h2><h2><em><u> </u></em></h2><h2><em><u>The teleological approach of Aristotle came to be dominant by late classical and medieval times. By this account, human nature really causes humans to become what they become, and so it exists somehow independently of individuals. This in turn has been understood as also showing a special connection between human nature and divinity. This approach understands human nature in terms of final and formal causes. In other words, nature itself (or a nature-creating divinity) has intentions and goals, similar somehow to human intentions and goals, and one of those goals is humanity living naturally. Such understandings of human nature see this nature as an "idea", or "form" of a human.[13] </u></em></h2><h2><em><u> </u></em></h2><h2><em><u>However, the existence of this invariable and metaphysical human nature is subject of much historical debate, continuing into modern times. Against this idea of a fixed human nature, the relative malleability of man has been argued especially strongly in recent centuries—firstly by early modernists such as Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. In Rousseau's Emile, or On Education, Rousseau wrote: "We do not know what our nature permits us to be".[14] Since the early 19th century, thinkers such as Hegel, Marx, Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Sartre, structuralists, and postmodernists have also sometimes argued against a fixed or innate human nature. </u></em></h2><h2><em><u> </u></em></h2><h2><em><u>Charles Darwin's theory of evolution has changed the nature of the discussion, supporting the proposition that mankind's ancestors were not like mankind today. Still more recent scientific perspectives—such as behaviorism, determinism, and the chemical model within modern psychiatry and psychology—claim to be neutral regarding human nature. As in much of modern science, such disciplines seek to explain with little or no recourse to metaphysical causation.[15] They can be offered to explain the origins of human nature and its underlying mechanisms, or to demonstrate capacities for change and diversity which would arguably violate the concept of a fixed human nature.</u></em></h2><h2><em><u>Explanation:</u></em></h2>

6 0

3 years ago

A word that describes a person who doesn't have a permanet home start with a N

olga nikolaevna [1]

Answer: Nigerian

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

What is the main belief that distinguished the Jewish faith from the others in the ancient world?

prisoha [69]

Answer:

Judaism, monotheistic religion developed among the ancient Hebrews. Judaism is characterized by a belief in one transcendent God who revealed himself to Abraham, Moses, and the Hebrew prophets and by a religious life in accordance with Scriptures and rabbinic tradition

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago