1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
schepotkina [342]
3 years ago
15

When did former slaves get the right to vote

History
1 answer:
adoni [48]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

1865

Explanation:

However, even though the 13th amendment passed, it was usually still really hard to vote as a black man back then, and black women did not have the right to vote in most, if not all places.

You might be interested in
Explain what happens when a national law conflicts with a state law
nikdorinn [45]
National laws are further enforced
6 0
3 years ago
In the U.S., each branch of the government has its own responsibilities and at the same time they work together to make the coun
Stolb23 [73]
C. separation of powers. The 3 branches of government are executive, judicial, and legislative. Each branch has their own separate duties and cannot do tasks that belong to a different branch. Separation of powers also refers to each branch checking each others decisions to keep one from being more powerful or controlling than the rest. 
7 0
3 years ago
How did geography shape ancient Chinese society during the Shang dynasty?
zaharov [31]

Answer:

the top answer is correct

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Why did vietnam split into two countries?
saul85 [17]
Because north vietnam was communists and south vietnam was capatlists... because of the cold war the two government types didnt get along and it forced both korea and vietnam to split into two.. though as a result of the vietnam war the north won and vietnam was made whole again under communist control
8 0
3 years ago
After U.S.-led invasions in the early 2000s, Afghanistan and Iraq changed from dictatorships to democracies. Is it right to spre
rodikova [14]

Answer:

Although the United States intervened in Iraq after it began its intervention in Afghanistan, it is withdrawing from Iraq first. Therefore, what the United States has and has not accomplished in Iraq will be discussed first.

It must be said to begin with that the United States did achieve some important successes in Iraq. It destroyed the brutal regime of Saddam Hussein — something that the Iraqi population had not only been unable to do on its own, but may not have been able to do later either. If Saddam had managed to transfer power to his sons (who were reportedly just as, or even more, vicious than their father), the regime may have survived for years or even decades.

In addition, the U.S.-led intervention helped the Kurds in northern Iraq. They had suffered terribly under Saddam Hussein but were able to solidify the tenuous autonomy they had achieved (also with U.S. help) after the 1990-91 Kuwait conflict and even build some prosperity in their zone.

Although Iraq’s Arab Sunni tribes were initially hostile to the U.S.-led intervention and fought an insurgent war against it, American forces were eventually able to make peace and work with most of them.

Most important, the United States organized and protected the holding of relatively free and fair elections at both the national and local levels. This allowed Iraq’s Arab Shia majority, which had also suffered dreadfully under Saddam Hussein, to play a leading role in Iraqi politics for the first time.

In addition to these successes, however, the United States has had some noteworthy failures in Iraq. First, the failure to halt the massive violence, looting and infrastructure breakdown that took place throughout the country immediately after the collapse of Saddam Hussein’s regime. This was caused by the Bush administration’s failure to anticipate and plan for the aftermath of Saddam’s downfall as well as to deploy enough troops to maintain order. As a result, the initial gratitude displayed by much of the Iraqi population toward the United States for delivering it from Saddam quickly disappeared.

Further, despite a massive troop presence, the United States was unable to prevent or stop the large-scale ethnic-cleansing campaigns that violent Arab Sunni and Arab Shia groups conducted against each other’s communities. These campaigns were so successful that some observers attributed the decline in violence in Iraq in 2008-09 not to the American troop surge ordered by President Bush, but to the ethnic-cleansing campaigns having largely completed the violent work of segregating the Sunni and the Shia communities from each other.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did the usa joined ww1 (there are 2 answers)
    12·2 answers
  • How did Henry VIII respond when the pope excommunicated him?
    6·2 answers
  • Which type of mental health professionals help people with mental disorders and their families accept and adjust to an illness?
    9·1 answer
  • Which statement does not describe the mercantile system in colonial America
    12·1 answer
  • In addition to the fur trade, what helped Samuel de Champlains Quebec colony
    13·2 answers
  • The midwestern states are between the ______ Mountains and the ___ Mountains.
    10·1 answer
  • How might the melting of glaciers affect ocean sea levels and storm development?
    10·2 answers
  • 3. If you wanted to use visuals, such as charts, graphs, and timelines, to learn about history, what type of history book would
    13·2 answers
  • The suffrage movement worked to grant women . was the first state to allow women’s suffrage. Women’s suffrage was granted across
    9·2 answers
  • Which actions by the US government is protected by the fifth amendment
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!