Answer:
20,000- to 25,000-hour mark
Explanation:
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
The actions that the Qin Dynasty would take against a person who wrote a book with their own opinions, about how they did not agree with the government were lethal.
Yes, during the Qin Dynasty in China, there was no freedom of speech or freedom of the press, or something similar. Quite the opposite.
Emperors during the Qin Dynasty were dictators and ruled an absolutists form of government. That is why they were the Emperors.
If someone expressed a critic or opposition against teh Emperor, he could be killed immediately. As simple as that. The Emperor was the absolute ruler and his word was the law.
I believe the answer is: No
An action is considered to be constitutional if it follows the regulation that is written under our constitution. According to the constitution ,The federal judge would held their position for the rest of their life. So limiting it to six years would not follow the regulation under the constitution.
The correct answer is: "If we remembered everything, we should on most occasions be as ill off as if we remembered nothing". This fact can be seen in the case of Russian journalist S, who forgot very little but, because of this ability, had difficulty with <em>abstract</em> thinking.
Abstract thinking is defined as the capacity of to think about ideas, facts, objects, thoughts, and principles that are not physical. Theses ideas are abstract because they escape the concept of "here and now" and take thinking to a deeper more symbolic level.
Answer:
rough
Explanation:
an anronym is the oppisite of a word and rough is the opisite of smooth
