Implied powers of the congress would mean creating taxes and raising and supporting an army
Answer: Option B and D
<u>Explanation:</u>
Sometimes the Congress of the United States of America has provisions to pass laws when it is unable to do so. Article I Section 8 Clause 18 of the constitution of the United States of America allows this provision.
The congress has the power to impose and collect taxes as mentioned in the Revenue Act of 1861, which went on to become the first tax related law of the nation. The clause also provide the power to provide welfare to those who are serving in the armed forces.
Answer:The Fear of Communism and the fact that Vietnam was being a puppet like state for the soviets in which America did not want Soviets idea spreading and overcoming democracy.
Explanation:During this time Vietnam was spread apart the north Communism and south was American in which they both fought neither winning or losing important positions or landmarks and eventually we called our troops back realizing the waste of supply’s for the inevitable truth that most of the Vietnamese people accepted communism.
Answer:
The correct answer is C on Edge
C) the principle of implied powers meant the Court might spend more time interpreting the Constitution rather than simply following it to the letter.
* also "Implied powers" are hard to distinguish and often cause a lot of debate which makes future Supreme Court decisions more complicated.
Explanation:
Just took quiz and got it right.
In the <em>Lochner v. New York</em> case of 1905, the Supreme Court ruled that states could not <u>impose limits on the number of hours that employees could work.</u>
Further details:
A law passed in 1895 in the state of New York mandated that bakery employees could not work more than 10 hours a day and not more than 60 hours in a week. A bakery owner named Joseph Lochner filed suit against the state, claiming the law was unconstitutional. At the time, the Supreme Court decision was based on the idea that such laws violated an employee's "freedom of contract." The majority of justices saw such a right implicit in the due process clause of the 14th Amendment, thinking that if employees agreed to work a heavy number of hours it was their right to do so.
In the time since the Lochner case, the Supreme Court has gone in the other direction, allowing laws that impose reasonable restrictions on businesses. An example would be <em>West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish </em>(1937), which upheld the constitutionality of a minimum wage law passed in Washington state.
I think it is empowered because someone else is feeding off the idea of the government having more power.
