Answer:
$34,310.45
Explanation:
Net present value is the present value of after-tax cash flows from an investment less the amount invested.
NPV can be calculated using a financial calculator
Only projects with a positive NPV should be accepted. A project with a negative NPV should not be chosen because it isn't profitable.
When choosing between positive NPV projects, choose the project with the highest NPV first because it is the most profitable.
Cash flow in year 0 = $-200,000
Cash flow in year 1 - 5 = 65,000
I = 12%
NPV = $34,310.45
To find the NPV using a financial calculator:
1. Input the cash flow values by pressing the CF button. After inputting the value, press enter and the arrow facing a downward direction.
2. after inputting all the cash flows, press the NPV button, input the value for I, press enter and the arrow facing a downward direction.
3. Press compute
Answer:
1) False
2) False
3) True
4) True
Explanation:
1) International trade did not begin in 18th century but it started in between 16th and 17th century when the barter system was shifting towards mercantilism. Therefore, answer is False.
2) Twentieth-century although marked duly rise in the female sports fans but marketing efforts were not primarily shifted towards them but included them among the male sports fan base. The female fans created a new segment of marketing which resulted in creating a new product line according to their tastes and preferences. Therefore, the answer is false.
3) Economic sanction does not take into consideration only the economic factors but also various other factors like trade barriers, restrictions on financial transactions, etc. Thus, this makes the economic sanctions more restrictive in nature than the trade sanctions. Therefore, the answer is true.
4) Less affluent countries generally focuses on minimizing the cost and not maximizing the profit in order to meet there requirements effectively. Thus, such countries mostly prefer to use ethnocentric orientation of management system and therefore prefer to operate locally as this would help them minimize the cost and reduce wastage. Therefore, the answer is true.
The characteristics of a high-performance work system approach to HRM are-
- Focuses on collective levels of human and social capital
- Enhances the performance of all employees systematically
- Improves employee motivation and opportunities
Among the trends that are occurring in today's high-performance work systems are reliance on knowledge workers, empowerment of employees to make decisions, and the use of teamwork.
A high-performance work system is a bundle of HRM practices designed to promote employees' skills, motivation and involvement to enable a firm to gain a sustainable competitive advantage (Datta et al., 2005; Guthrie, 2001; Huselid, 1995), which includes employment security, extensive training, teams and decentralized
The phrase 'high-performance human resources' (HPHR) is generally taken to refer to human resource management (HRM) practices that have positive effects on the performance of an enterprise, typically a business enterprise.
Learn more about high-performance test here: brainly.com/question/1532968
#SPJ4
4. A scope statement
For example, if you are remodeling your kitchen and dining room the scope statement would say what would be done in those rooms and that NO work would be done in the rest of the house. It is an important document to make sure all parties are on the same page.
Answer:
Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act
Explanation:
The Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act (GLBA), also known as the Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999, (enacted November 12, 1999) is an act of the 106th United States Congress (1999–2001). It repealed part of the Glass–Steagall Act of 1933, removing barriers in the market among banking companies, securities companies and insurance companies that prohibited any one institution from acting as any combination of an investment bank, a commercial bank, and an insurance company. With the bipartisan passage of the Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act, commercial banks, investment banks, securities firms, and insurance companies were allowed to consolidate. Furthermore, it failed to give to the SEC or any other financial regulatory agency the authority to regulate large investment bank holding companies. The legislation was signed into law by President Bill Clinton.
