Russo-japanese war. Hope i helped!
Though both sides received benefits, however, the north seemed to gain the most. It seemed so because the major victory for the south was the Fugitive Slave Law. In the end, the north refused to enforce it. By extension, it shows that the north seemed powerful.
<h3>What is better deal in the Compromise of 1850?</h3>
As part of the Compromise of 1850, the Fugitive Slave Act was amended and the slave trade in Washington, D.C., was abolished. Furthermore, California entered the Union as a free state and a territorial government was created in Utah.
Therefore, the correct answer is as given above
learn more about the Compromise of 1850: brainly.com/question/8165267
#SPJ1
Answer:
Because they had <u>a massive exploration by the mother country</u> (the one responsible by the conquest), <u>which took a considerable part of their goods.</u>
Explanation:
The Latin American colonies were different from the British Colonies (Thirteen Colonies and Canada) <u>because they were explored massively by Portugal and Spain during the three centuries of colonialism.</u> The Iberian countries were following an economic and political idea called <u>Mercantilism</u> which, as the main aspect, was<u> the exploration of a colony, taking the goods and sending it to the mother country. Only a small part was left for the colony.</u> And why those colonies don't rebel against the mother country, you may ask. Because since the very moment the Iberian countries began their colonization, they didn't leave any possibility of revolution, with laws and severe control of the settlers and natives. <u>Any try of revolution or riot was massively dismissed with violence.</u>