1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nadya68 [22]
3 years ago
6

What is nationalism?

History
1 answer:
BlackZzzverrR [31]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: C

Explanation:

You might be interested in
How did the Phoenicians rise to prominence?
astra-53 [7]
So it's been years since I've studied this, but I do know one thing important is the introduction of coin Currency and establishment of banks
4 0
3 years ago
Which philosopher believed that people were inherently evil and that government should control them?
Inessa05 [86]

Explanation:

In 1651, Thomas Hobbes famously wrote that life in the state of nature – that is, our natural condition outside the authority of a political state – is ‘solitary, poore, nasty brutish, and short.’ Just over a century later, Jean-Jacques Rousseau countered that human nature is essentially good, and that we could have lived peaceful and happy lives well before the development of anything like the modern state. At first glance, then, Hobbes and Rousseau represent opposing poles in answer to one of the age-old questions of human nature: are we naturally good or evil? In fact, their actual positions are both more complicated and interesting than this stark dichotomy suggests. But why, if at all, should we even think about human nature in these terms, and what can returning to this philosophical debate tell us about how to evaluate the political world we inhabit today?

The question of whether humans are inherently good or evil might seem like a throwback to theological controversies about Original Sin, perhaps one that serious philosophers should leave aside. After all, humans are complex creatures capable of both good and evil. To come down unequivocally on one side of this debate might seem rather naïve, the mark of someone who has failed to grasp the messy reality of the human condition. Maybe so. But what Hobbes and Rousseau saw very clearly is that our judgements about the societies in which we live are greatly shaped by underlying visions of human nature and the political possibilities that these visions entail.

5 0
3 years ago
The Sahara Desert makes up more than
strojnjashka [21]

Answer:

25 %

Explanation:

5 0
1 year ago
What are the privileges and restrictions of sitting on the ways and means committee
yuradex [85]

Answer:

The Committee on Ways and Means is the chief tax-writing committee of the United States House of Representatives. Members of the Ways and Means Committee are not allowed to serve on any other House Committee unless they are granted a waiver from their party's congressional leadership.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What does the word parallel mean when giving directions to someone to find a location?
muminat
You can be parallel to something as in next to or you will pass it
3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which caused cities and towns to develop?
    12·2 answers
  • Which group of Native Americans settled in the Great Plains?
    10·1 answer
  • Which statements describe the economy of Roman ?
    6·2 answers
  • Women and minority groups were denied many civil rights until the mid-1900s.
    6·2 answers
  • WILL AWARD POINTS! NEED HELP
    6·1 answer
  • Did the tri cameral system caused misery among the black people​
    13·1 answer
  • What needs to happen after the energy is produced?
    14·1 answer
  • 50. The organizational components of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
    12·1 answer
  • Read the advertisement for employment.
    15·1 answer
  • Hough many Enlightenment philosophers held traditional views, others called for greater equality for in education and society.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!