When a governor acts as head of his or her political party, he or she is fulfilling the role of chief legislator.
Chief Parliament: The US Parliament should consider legislative changes proposed by the US President. The president can also veto a bill passed by parliament, but the president's veto can be overturned by a majority of members of both houses.
President Carter as Chief Congressman: Jimmy Carter proposed dozens of important laws during his tenure as President. Among the issues he raised were environmental protection, deregulation of some industries, and foreign policy. Here is an example of President Carter's law:
Panama Canal Treaty: President Carter is an important step in his goal of improving relations between the United States and Latin America in returning the Panama Canal to Panama. Was considered. Opponents, however, believed the United States should continue to control the canal, arguing that "we built the canal, paid for it, and it's ours."
Learn more about Chief legislator here: brainly.com/question/4384
#SPJ4
Considering the situation described above, the best action to take is to "research the source of the article to evaluate its credibility and reliability."
This is because social media has been found many times without a number where rumors and opinions travel easily.
Also, because an incendiary headline is a sensational headline that writers or bloggers use to attract readers, there is a high tendency that the article content might be false or just an opinion.
Therefore to be sure about the article's truthfulness sent to me, I need to research the source to evaluate its credibility and reliability.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/19607464
A person who is able to motivate others to identify with and commit themselves to the group's mission would be best described as a(n) transformational leader.
Answer:
A.admissible as habit evidence
Explanation:
A passenger of Dan sustained injuries and filed a lawsuit against him. The passenger( plaintiff) presented someone to testify about how Dan has a bad reputation for reckless driving in the community.
This testimony by White would most likely be admissible in the court of law because Dan already has a bad reputation of the action he’s been charged with in his community.This makes it admissible as habit evidence.
