Is Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet mostly a love story or mostly a tragedy?

1 answer:

5 0

For one thing, while Romeo does seem fickle at first, Rosaline has a purpose. She's meant to show us how Romeo changes over the course of the play. In the beginning, he was basically in the throes of puppy love--going on about her looks, her smile, blah, blah, blah. There were no hurdles beyond her own disinterest, no real love. It was shallow, and meant to be seen as such. Once Juliet comes into the picture, though, Romeo starts to grow up. He starts thinking about more than looks, starts weighing consequences, and by the end, he's willing to choose death over a life without Juliet (which is still stupid to me, but he wouldn't have even considered that for Rosaline). Rosaline was never more than a foil.

And though their relationship came on quickly, I think that was mostly due to the time constraints. Shakespeare had to have them meet, fall in love, and off themselves within a very short period. There wasn't time for frequent meetings or any of that. It had to happen quickly...and though I'm the last person to believe in love at first sight, they (and the people who would watch the play being performed) often did. Courtly love, romantic love...that was the ideal for the time period, even if it wasn't ever the reality. Of course Shakespeare included it--he had to appease the higher classes. 

Besides, marriage wasn't something that took a lot of thought on their part. They were financially and socially matched, and it wasn't as though they were wondering whether or not they could handle living together. That's something people in our time, not theirs, think about. They were probably just glad to have found someone on their own as opposed to an arranged marriage with a stranger. It was enough for them. 

Romeo wasn't supposed to be a stalker. He was supposed to be a romantic...though I do agree with you. He annoys me. A lot. 

There WAS love, though. Selfish love at times. Immature love, but still love. 

This was actually one of Shakespeare's more brilliant plays. I may pretty much hate it, but I've studied this one in depth. The things he does with the language is just brilliant, even if it does take a LOT of study to appreciate it. He put a lot into that one.

You might be interested in

CAN PEOPLE POST QUESTIONS THAT ARE ALSO FOR 6TH GRADE PLEASE!!◉‿◉

LiRa [457]

Answer:

yes if you have a question you can ask

5 0

3 years ago

Edit the following paragraph by correcting the inconsistent verb tense. Copy the corrected paragraph onto your own sheet of pape

Alex

In the Middle Ages, most people lived in villages and worked as agricultural laborers, or peasants. Every village had a “lord,” and peasants worked on his land. Much of what they produced went to the lord and his family. What little food was leftover went to support the peasants’ families. In return for their labor, the lord offered them protection. A peasant’s day usually began before sunrise and involved long hours of backbreaking work, which included plowing the land, planting seeds, and cutting the crops for harvesting. The working life of a peasant in the Middle Ages was usually demanded and exhausting.

5 0

3 years ago

B. Direction: Explain why you should build simple products. 5pts

Rzqust [24]

Why You Should Build Simple Products:-

1.People have an easier time knowing if they're in your target market or not.

2.You can grow the products by listening to customers, rather than prospects.

3.You can get your product out the door faster which often means cheaper.

7 0

3 years ago

Why did Nick's father tell him he should refrain from judging or criticizing other people? -From the Great Gatsby

KIM [24]

Answer:he said just remember that all the people in this world haven’t had the advantages that you’ve had.

Explanation: ‘Whenever you feel like criticizing anyone,’ he told me, ‘just remember that all the people in this world haven’t had the advantages that you’ve had.’”

—Nick Carraway, The Great Gatsby

F is for F. Scott Fitzgerald, author of Gatsby and master of human insight wrapped in poetry. His novel begins here, his narrator Nick Carraway, grappling with his father’s caution of criticism—

“All the people in this world haven’t had the advantages that you’ve had.”

In short, people judge, and Nick tries to refrain because his father said so. I think about Nick’s words and my life. I remember how often my mother would stop herself mid-criticism and say, “I’m not going to say that. It wasn’t very nice.” Then Philippians 4:8 comes to mind about thinking on excellent, praiseworthy things.

Speaking of excellence and praise, what about this one for its sheer lyricism? “It was dawn now on Long Island and we went about opening the rest of the windows downstairs, filling the house with grey turning, gold turning light. The shadow of a tree fell abruptly across the dew and ghostly birds began to sing among the blue leaves. There was a slow pleasant movement in the air, scarcely a wind, promising a cool lovely day.”

5 0

3 years ago

With a convulsive motion, he tore away the ministerial band from before his breast. It was revealed! But it were irreverent to d

Vlada [557]

The statement that BEST describes the effect of this choice is A It suggests that the revelation was too shocking to describe in words.

According to the given excerpt, the author talks about the nature of the minister’s secret affliction, however, he does not reveal it to the readers, but reveals it to the townspeople.

He says that it is irrelevant to describe the revelation which suggests that the revelation was too shocking to describe in words.

Therefore, the correct answer is option A.