1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alexus [3.1K]
3 years ago
15

Could your state pass a law setting requirements for becoming a citizen of the United states

History
1 answer:
posledela3 years ago
5 0

No, no U.S. state has this prerogative. The rules for acquisition of United States citizenship are set out in the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, which is a uniform legislation as required by the constitution, which determines in its Article I, section 8, clause 4 that Congress shall have power "To establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization."

You might be interested in
Who were the Loyalists?
arlik [135]

Answer:

Loyalists wanted to pursue peaceful forms of protest because they believed that violence would give rise to mob rule or tyranny. They also believed that independence would mean the loss of economic benefits derived from membership in the British mercantile system.

Explanation:

so b sorry if wrong

4 0
3 years ago
List the factors which brought The first world War?​
yanalaym [24]

1. Friends don’t let friends fight alone

A tangled web of strong political alliances among nations meant that most great powers felt obliged to help their partners once war was declared.

After the murder of an Austrian Archduke by Serbian assassins, Austria-Hungary prepared for war against Serbia, which was allied with Russia.

Once Russia mobilized, Austria-Hungary’s ally, Germany, declared war on both Russia and Russia’s ally, France. Great Britain and its empire, sympathetic to France, declared war on Germany (Canada was not consulted).

Alliances originally intended as defensive pacts ended up looking threatening to outsiders. This perilous network of allegiances is an accepted part of all narratives about the First World War. German historian Andreas Hilgruber was one of many who showed how dangerous and costly all of these alliances were.

2. Armed to the teeth

Europe in 1914 was armed to the teeth. Vast fleets of warships were being constructed, conscription was implemented in most of the great powers to allow large armies to be kept in reserve, weapons and ammunition were stockpiled, and detailed war plans were made.

The impact of the proliferation of the instruments of war as a cause of the outbreak of the conflict was highlighted by David Stevenson’s Armaments and the Coming of War (1996). A large army spoiling for a fight may well seek one out.

3. Capitalist imperialism

During the First World War, Vladimir Lenin, the father of the Soviet Union, wrote an essay entitled Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism (1917), in which he laid out the foundation of his own philosophy of communism.

He believed that the war was the product of capitalist financial monopolies within states, which created national rivalries and led the great powers into a destructive conflict over access to raw materials and undeveloped markets.

Others since have blamed imperialism itself and commercial interests.

4. War on a tight schedule

A.J.P. Taylor, one of the 20th century’s great historians, argued in War by Timetable (1969) that in 1914, thanks to relatively new transportation (railroad) and communications (telegraph and telephone) technologies, every European power believed that the ability to mobilize their armies faster than their neighbours would by itself deter war.

Every power drafted elaborate mobilization timetables so that they could outrace their potential opponents. When the crisis of 1914 occurred, none of the leaders really wanted war, according to Taylor, but each felt they had to mobilize faster than the others or lose the advantage.

They became the victims of their own logistical preparations, and Europe slid unwillingly but relentlessly into war. Barbara Tuchman’s book The Guns of August (1962) similarly identified the dangers of technology in causing conflicts to escalate rapidly.

5. Blame Germany

In the Treaty of Versailles that officially ended the war, Germany was made to accept the blame for causing the conflict, and after that German governments spent decades denying their sole responsibility.

They convinced many people, but after the Second World War, German historian Fritz Fischer looked into previously-classified archives for the first time. Fischer concluded in his book German War Aims in the First World War (1961) that Imperial Germany had deliberately provoked a general war as part of a policy of conquest much like that undertaken by Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Germany 20 years later.

Fischer’s conclusions remain controversial to this day.

6. No, blame Britain

The idea that Britain caused the war was the live grenade that firebrand historian Niall Ferguson lobbed into the debate when he wrote The Pity of War (1999), though Paul Schroeder had put forward a similar argument earlier.

Ferguson claimed that not only did British statesmen encourage France and Russia to oppose Germany, but that Britain’s own intervention turned a regional European brawl into a global war.

The British may not have directly started it, according to Ferguson, but they were liable for greatly expanding the scope of the war and making it drag on as long as it did.

7. People being people

Canadian historian Margaret Macmillan has published a major book, The War That Ended Peace (2013), which presents a synthesis of many different factors: alliances and power politics; reckless diplomacy; ethnic nationalism; and, most of all, the personal character and relationships of the almost uncountable number of historical figures who had a hand in the coming of war.

Her work helps to highlight the fact that for all the great and powerful forces that seemed to grind the world inexorably into war in 1914, everything ultimately came down to the beliefs, prejudices, rivalries, and schemes of a great array of personalities and people.

3 0
3 years ago
The majority of colonists who first settled in Plymouth were
Veronika [31]
I believe that would be E. The closest answer would be D, but these colonists were very Puritan and didn't like how the church was being run at all, so they moved to an entirely different country to get away from it. They wanted major changes in church practices, but that would never happen, so they went away and started their own society which followed their own values.
3 0
3 years ago
The Frankish king, ____, would convert from paganism to _______________________- and establish the faith throughout his kingdom.
Aleonysh [2.5K]

Answer:

The Frankish king, Clovis, would convert from paganism to Christianity - and establish the faith throughout his kingdom. A later Frankish general named Charles Martel would repel a Muslim invasion and begin the Christian reconquest of the Iberian Peninsula.

The greatest of the Frankish rulers in Western Europe was Charlemagne The Great. In 800, the Pope crowned Charlemagne Emperor of the Holy Roman Empire. The empire would last over one thousand years, but would never achieve Charlemagne’s goal of creating a unified Christian empire.

Explanation:

Frankish Kingdom and later Empire was the largest state created after the fall of Roman Empire.

Clovis, who was the first known leader of the Merovingian dynasty converted to Christianity, but the peak of the country was during the Carolingian dynasty.

Charlemagne created an Empire that spread across most of modern Western Europe.

8 0
2 years ago
Why was the Code of Hammurabi significant, what did it do, and how did it work?
Shalnov [3]

Answer:   The Hammurabi code of laws, a collection of 282 rules, established standards for commercial interactions and set fines and punishments to meet the requirements of justice. Hammurabi's Code was carved onto a massive, finger-shaped black stone stele (pillar) that was looted by invaders and finally rediscovered in 1901.

Explanation: plz mark as brainly

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which sentence is most clearly focused on the context of Al Gore’s speech?
    6·1 answer
  • The main difference between a nation and I stayed is that a nation is
    8·2 answers
  • From 1885 to 1887, the main problem facing western cattle barons were
    10·1 answer
  • Which was not a cause of world war 2 in europe?
    10·1 answer
  • Write a paragraph describing the events that led to the U.S. entry into World War I on the Allied side and then explain the resu
    14·1 answer
  • Match the amendment with the definition. tenth amendment thirteenth amendment nineteenth amendment eighteenth amendment ninth am
    7·1 answer
  • Which european power was first to establish permanent colonies in the americas
    8·1 answer
  • How did Descartes and Kepler contribute to the new scientific thinking?
    8·2 answers
  • Capitalism Will Eat Democracy — Unless We Speak Up By Yanis Varoufakis commonlit
    7·1 answer
  • According to the quote, the Enlightenment encourages people to <br> for themselves.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!