1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Triss [41]
2 years ago
7

The essence of the "shogunate system" was that a. the emperor became the central ruler and the shogun became a nominal official.

b. the peasants were granted the rank of samurai. c. governmental power became decentralized under the emperor. d. governmental power became centralized under the shogun, while the emperor ruled in name only. e. the military was put under complete civilian control.
History
1 answer:
olga2289 [7]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

<h3>d. governmental power became centralized under the shogun, while the emperor ruled in name only.</h3>

Explanation:

The Shogunate system was established in Japan by Tokugawa Ieyasu in 1603 and lasted till 1867. Under this system, the Shoguns upheld all major executive powers while the emperor remained confined within the capital, Kyoto.

The Shoguns served as the landlords among the distributed regions in the country. Each regional administration had a Shogun who controlled the whole political, social and economical spheres of that particular region.

This system mobilized the powers of the emperor and controlled the whole administrative system. The emperor remained as the head of the country but ruled in name only.

You might be interested in
After World War II, why did the USSR want to control countries in Eastern Europe?
krek1111 [17]
Slavic and Scandinavian countries are very rich in resources, and Russia wanted to control most trade in Europe until the collapse of the Soviet Union. More trade = More power and they were still recovering after the HARD losses when the Germans' invaded Leningrad and the war.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Describe the muslim attempt to conquer constantinople. was the attempt successful?
koban [17]
<span>The conquest was successful. With the siege of Istanbul, the Ottomans proceeded to establish hegemony over numerous independent Turkish states within Anatolia. The result of imperial conquest was to unify the Turkish populations in Anatolia. In turn, other non Turkish, Muslim communities and principalities were brought together under the aegis of Ottoman leadership. </span>
7 0
3 years ago
When William Wilberforce and the abolitionists began their fight against the slave trade in Britain, how much of Britain’s econo
Aliun [14]

one-tenth is the answer to this question


5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
100 POINTS cuz why not it's alot of work and brainliest to best answer!
Yanka [14]

Answer:It is fairly clear that the Mexican highlands were far too dry during the much warmer interval that prevailed from 5000 to 1500 BCE for agriculture to supply more than half of a given population’s energy needs. This was not the case along the alluvial lowlands of southern Mesoamerica, and it is no accident that the best evidence for the earliest permanent villages in Mesoamerica comes from the Pacific littoral of Chiapas (Mexico) and Guatemala, although comparable settlements also have been reported from both the Maya lowlands (Belize) and the Veracruz Gulf coast.

The Barra (c. 1800–1500 BCE), Ocós (1500–1200 BCE), and Cuadros (1100–900 BCE) phases of the Pacific coasts of Chiapas and Guatemala are good examples of early village cultures. The Barra phase appears to have been transitional from earlier preagricultural phases and may not have been primarily dependent upon corn farming; but people of the Ocós and Cuadros phases raised a small-eared corn known as nal-tel, which was ground on metates and manos and cooked in globular jars. From the rich lagoons and estuaries in this area, the villagers obtained shellfish, crabs, fish, and turtles. Their villages were small, with perhaps 10 to 12 thatched-roof houses arranged haphazardly.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If legislators weren’t afforded immunities, how would the democratic process suffer?
eduard

Answer:

<h3>Representatives will be unable to support the rights of the people effectively.</h3>

Explanation:

  • Legislative immunity provides senators and representatives the right to speak and state their opinions in the Congress without any fear of arbitrary arrest or defamation.
  • This is done not to ensure the interest of the speaker but to protect the voice of the people which the speaker is representing.
  • In a democracy the voice of the people is taken into account without fail. Therefore, the need to protect the representatives to speak or state their opinions in the Congress on behalf of the people becomes mandatory.
  • If the provision of legislative immunity is not allowed, the essence of democratic process to represent and support the rights of the people would be ineffective.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Mark each statement if it reflects Sumerian religious beliefs. A. The Sumerians believed in many gods. B. The Sumerians believed
    5·1 answer
  • Why does jefferson begin with points about human rights before discussing the colonists specific grievances?
    5·2 answers
  • A negative economic effect of world war 2 wa
    14·1 answer
  • What were Washington's three biggest fears about becoming president?
    7·1 answer
  • What happened in the North Anican cities of Carthage and viene as a result of having siphium Add the event to the chart ​
    15·1 answer
  • In the 1800s, factories hired more women and children than they had in the past because
    5·2 answers
  • How can overcrowding contribute to the collapse of a civilization?​
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following was a cause of the pullman strike of 1894.
    15·2 answers
  • Que efecto tienen loa océanos sobre los huracanes
    7·1 answer
  • Why Northerners lost interest in Reconstruction?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!