B. Plastic is a tough material to break than most other materials.
Hey there!
I take it we're talking about <em>The Phantom Tollbooth.
</em>In this story, the two Kingdoms- Digitopolis and Dictionopolis, ruled by the Mathemagician and King Azaz, are not at peace.
<em />The Mathemagician believes that numbers are better than words, and Azaz thinks otherwise, and they refuse to talk with each other.
However, they both are the same in one aspect because they both agree on something, and that is that they always will agree that they always will disagree with each other.
Also, towards the end of the book (no spoilers!) they begin to realize the true meaning of working together to save the day.
Hope this helps
Answer:
Madame Loisel
Explanation:
"The Necklace" is a story written by<em> Guy de Maupassant. </em>Having arrived home one evening, Monsieur Loisel immediately told her wife, <em>Madame Loisel</em><em> (Mathilde Loisel)</em><em> </em>about an invitation at the palace requested by Georges Ramponneau.
However, this didn't make <em>Madame Loisel </em>happy because all she was thinking was the dress she'd be wearing to the event. She didn't have any dress to wear, thus, she asked his husband the question<em> "And what do you wish me to put on my back?" </em>His husband told her that she could wear the dress she wore at the theater. This even made Madame Loisel cry harder and told her husband to give the invitation to someone else.
Answer:
she felt that she and her family belonged to neither American or Canadian side.
Explanation:
The young boy's mother told the Canadian border guard that they are coming from and going to a place called "Standoff" because she felt that she and her family belonged to neither American or Canadian side.
The mother simply wanted to be "Blackfoot" and felt that her identity should not rest on American or Canadian Blackfoot. The mothers used the place "Standoff" because that's where she felt like she belonged, a place which neither America or Canada owned, when asked about her citizenship.
Answer: The circular flow of income helps identify the key relationship of government expenditure towards household and domestic firms, which is when “income rises, spending rises, and when spending rises, output rises which [then again] gives rises to incomes”
Explanation: :)
