Answer:
The argument is not sound; the author uses an either-or argument.
Explanation:
"If your work is first with you, and your fee second, work is your master."
Answer:
I would say all except the last one
Explanation:
Close reading is when you read a literary work and you make notes of it each each paragraph so one is able to understand more in depth of the work. The last one is just understanding the surface meaning which is what one would do if they were to skim
Yes of course why not yeah yea he
Answer:
The length of the description emphasizes his importance to the story.
Explanation:
John Steinbeck's<em> Travels with Charley</em> tells the story of the author on his travels with his dog Charlie. The travelogue details the road trip that the famed author took around the United States with his trusted poodle.
In the stated passage about Charlie, the poddle <em>"contributed much to the trip"</em> which the narrator mentions. The dog is of great importance to the author, stating that Charles le Chien aka Charles <em>"is a bond between strangers"</em>. This description of the dog in a much greater length is to emphasize on the importance of Charley to the story.
The correct answer is this one: "They went to the railroad stations and bought tickets for the fast trains and the slow trains and even the trains that back up and run backward instead of where they start to go." This is the line of the excerpt from Carl Sandburg's "How the Animals Lost Their Tails and Got Them Back Traveling from Philadelphia to Medicine Hat" that uses repetition and <span>alliteration. hit me up if u need more answers
</span>
