The founders saw the importance of a strong military to protect the country and its citizens, but they named the President, a civilian, the "commander in chief" of the armed services. They were ever mindful of checking and balancing power, and they did not want a military general to seize the government
Answer: Communist
Explanation:
China, Cuba, and North Korea all have one thing in common, and that they are ruled by a communist party. However, apart from that the three really have nothing else in common. North Korea is very isolationist and has a barely functioning economy, Cuba is autocratic and its economy is also poor, the only outlier here is China which is prospering due to its semi-Capitalistic economic policies. The question could definitely be worded better in my opinion.
The creation of the Federalist Party, that favored business, a strong government and a lax interpretation of the Constitution, and the Democratic-Republican Party, that wanted a society based on small farms and a weaker core government; changed the nature of politics in the US as they proposed a dichotomy when voting, since the Constitution had been silent about political parties.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be that the North had better industrial capabilities, which allowed them to produce more war materials. </span></span>
Charles Howard and Sir Francis Drake. which was france
