The style of "Gumption" is different from that of "To Build a Fire" by <span>The style of "Gumption" is developed through personification, while the style of "To Build A Fire" is overly informal.</span>
<span>Tens of thousands of sub-Saharan Africans try to cross the Mediterranean each year because of various reasons: many tries to escape a life built on poverty and misery, other tries to get out from a very unstable country were they might not survive long or were there is a war in act, others tries to find a better life in the European countries, because there are no resources left in their own,
---
These refugees are commonly portrayed as dangerous people, perhaps people that come in the European country to stole jobs from Eupoean, or to take bits of help from the country there are in without contributing to the country, or they are criminals that do not want to work or pay taxes, or sometimes they are also portrayed as terrorist.</span>
The main difference is the independence movement India didn't use any force, meanwhile the independence movement in Algeria did.
Indian independence movement led by Mahatma Ghandi in his ant-war movement
The Algerian Independence was led by Charles de Gaulle in Algerian Revolution war
The argument made by Holmes was that the protection of free speech is important but there are some cases in which personal expression is irresponsible and can be banned.
<h3>What is the case of Schenck v. United States?</h3>
The Court determined that a state could constitutionally limit an individual's free speech rights under the First Amendment.
Hence, the Justice of the state made an argument that the the protection of free speech is important but there are some cases in which personal expression is irresponsible and can be banned.
Therefore, the Option C is correct.
Read more about Schenck v. United States
<em>brainly.com/question/2764676</em>
#SPJ1
