The best answer would be that the two major political parties in the United States are a considered part of "<span>A) the principle of checks and balances" although this is not what the Founders had in mind when they spoke of checks and balances. </span>
Answer:
Texas
Explanation:
In 1836 Texas gained independence from Mexico although at the beginning was not to be included in the Union then it was incorporated since there were Northern Political Interests and then all this political entanglement could very possibly lead to war.
Answer:
Competition between organizational forms manifests itself in political contention over the law. The authors analyze the political
strength and organization of the groups that supported and opposed
state anti-chain-store laws. The enactment of these laws depended
on intrastate political activity and the interstate diffusion of antichain-store legislation. The repeal process relied on supra state activity, as nationally organized pro-chain-store forces shifted the
arena of contention to the Supreme Court and forged national alliances with labor unions and agricultural cooperatives. In both
enactment and repeal, the political resources and strategies of organizational forms interacted with existing institutions to determine
the trajectory of institutional change.
Explanation:
Pennsylvania decided to treat the “savages” with dignity and respect. His critics said it would never work. Native Americans were encouraged to come to Philadelphia if they had grievances. For almost 75 years, from 1682 to 1755, Pennsylvania was the only colony that didn't have an army but had peace.
C. Locate sources that contradict the author's evidence and conclusions.
Notice some of the broad, sweeping claims made by the author, without support from any cited references:
"I think its capital city had the largest population of any city in all world history." All of world history would include modern cities that have vastly more population than any city in ancient Greece.
"I bet its military conquered nearly all of Europe, Asia, and Africa." That didn't happen -- thus no authoritative sources to cite to prove it did.
"I've heard a report that said" ... What report? Where? Cite the source!
A historian would be able to challenge and refute the claims of this author by citing actual, reliable material that contradicts his unfounded claims.
