1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vredina [299]
3 years ago
8

Minority groups in the United States have, on average, significantly lower net worth than white Americans even when the two have

similar education, income, and occupations. Sociologists attribute the wealth gap largely to housing policies that excluded minority individuals from home ownership. This is an example of __________ discrimination.
A. de jure.
B. purposeful.
C. past-in-present.
D. side-effect.
Social Studies
1 answer:
Brilliant_brown [7]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

This is an example of C. Past-in-present discrimination.

Explanation:

Past-in-present discrimination is a term used to describe the present effects of discrimination that minority groups suffer, due to past discrimination. Most of the discriminatory practices that were legal in the past are no longer allowed, such as the incapability of certain minority groups to own a house, but they have effects that people continue to live with in the present.

In this case, that people couln't own a home has impacted their net worth, although in the present they are allowed to buy a house, which proves that making these discriminatory practices ilegal is has not been enough to close the wealth gap between white Americans and other minority groups, or even the wealth gap between men and women.

You might be interested in
Under which Executive Office of the president do the chief of staff and press secretary reside?
Aleonysh [2.5K]
The answer is A.) White House Office

4 0
3 years ago
According to the optimistic scenario, the __________ will abandon its military dictatorships and progress toward democracy as a
Alex Ar [27]
According to the optimistic scenario, the South will abandon its military dictatorships and progress toward democracy as a means of gaining acceptance into the international community.
Democracy, a system of government by the whole population or all the eligible members of a State.
4 0
3 years ago
More theories of regulation The capture theory of regulation asserts that: Regulators capture the economic profits of the firms
netineya [11]

Answer: Regulators promote the interests of the firms they regulate.

Explanation: Capture theory of regulation asserts that regulators promote the interest of the firms they regulate. The result is that an agency that are charged with acting in the public interest, instead acts in ways that benefit the industry it is supposed to be regulating. Capture theory of regulation is a theory that explains agency established to regulate an industry for the benefit of society acts in the opposite to promote the benefit of the industry.

Regulatory capture is an economic theory which asserts that regulatory agencies may come to be dominated by the industries or interests they are charged with regulating. The captured agency begins to advance the interests of the industry rather than protecting the consumers. Problems arise when a regulating agency acts in the interests of regulated industry to the detriment of the general public.

4 0
3 years ago
When you look at the portrait of your family that hangs on the wall in your house, you tend to see an entire family—multiple mem
Tatiana [17]

Answer:

a. unity.                                            

Explanation:

Principle of unity: The term "principle of unity" is also referred as "principle of harmony", and is described as a significant principle related to design that gives a particular artwork a sense of coherence or cohesion. It is described as completeness or wholeness of a particular picture. Unity generally measures or identifies the way different elements of an individual's design work together.

In the question above, the given statement signifies the consciousness principle of unity.

5 0
3 years ago
Charles is a federal judge whose judicial decisions are part of case law, which does not include interpretations of
mojhsa [17]
I believe the answer is B. <span>sound bites in the media.
Sound bites in the media refers to the short phrases that summarize what the speaker have to say.
Even though sound bites often used in meda interview, it wouldn't played any role in interpreting judicial decisions.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Reference groups provide us with: the ability to be concerned with accomplishing a task strict conformity to rigid organizationa
    11·1 answer
  • What country is located at the Southernmost tip of Africa?
    13·2 answers
  • Philip zimbardo’s famous stanford prison experiments, much like the situation at abu ghraib prison, reaffirm what lesson about b
    15·1 answer
  • Tell me two things that come to mind when you about greece.
    12·2 answers
  • Please help on this one?
    10·1 answer
  • What is the answer to life the universe and everything
    10·2 answers
  • What are some other possible effects of a hurricane?
    13·2 answers
  • I will give brainliest
    13·1 answer
  • How did the Mongols rule their people
    10·2 answers
  • The considerable power that the police have to decide who is actually arrested,
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!