Answer:
The ratio between won and lost is ![\frac{7}{4}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B7%7D%7B4%7D)
Step-by-step explanation:
<u><em>The question in English is</em></u>
A table tennis team won 21 games and lost 12 games, what is the ratio between won and lost?
Let
x ------> the number of games won
y -----> the number of games lost
we have
![x=21\ games](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=x%3D21%5C%20games)
![y=12\ games](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=y%3D12%5C%20games)
we know that
To find the ratio divide the number of games won by the number of games lost
so
![\frac{x}{y}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7Bx%7D%7By%7D)
substitute the values
![\frac{21}{12}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B21%7D%7B12%7D)
Simplify
![\frac{7}{4}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B7%7D%7B4%7D)
Hey there!
A quadrilateral has 360 degrees. So add all the degrees together to 360. 9x+1+5x-12+8x+61+90=360. 90 degrees is in the bottom left corner. Combine like terms. 22x+140=360. Subtract 140 from each side. 22x=220. Divide 22 on each side to get x=10. Plug in 10 for x in angle D. 5(10)-12=38. The measure of angle D is 38 degrees.
I hope this helps!
Answer:
-8 < x < -5 or x > -4
Step-by-step explanation:
(Work cannot be showed due to issue occured)
Answer: The ratio is 2.39, which means that the larger acute angle is 2.39 times the smaller acute angle.
Step-by-step explanation:
I suppose that the "legs" of a triangle rectangle are the cathati.
if L is the length of the shorter leg, 2*L is the length of the longest leg.
Now you can remember the relation:
Tan(a) = (opposite cathetus)/(adjacent cathetus)
Then there is one acute angle calculated as:
Tan(θ) = (shorter leg)/(longer leg)
Tan(φ) = (longer leg)/(shorter leg)
And we want to find the ratio between the measure of the larger acute angle and the smaller acute angle.
Then we need to find θ and φ.
Tan(θ) = L/(2*L)
Tan(θ) = 1/2
θ = Atan(1/2) = 26.57°
Tan(φ) = (2*L)/L
Tan(φ) = 2
φ = Atan(2) = 63.43°
Then the ratio between the larger acute angle and the smaller acute angle is:
R = (63.43°)/(26.57°) = 2.39
This means that the larger acute angle is 2.39 times the smaller acute angle.
I believe that's correct.