Skill development, more opportunities
Answer:
The gain that Sheridan should recognize on this exchange is $135000
Explanation:
Where Exchange Transaction lacks commercial substance, the asset that is acquired is measured at the <em>Carrying Amount or Undepreciated Cost </em> of the asset given up.
The gain will then include an <em>further consideration acquired</em> on the exchange of an asset.
<u>Entries to record the exchange are as follows :</u>
Cash $135000 (debit)
New Asset at undepreciated cost $420300 (debit)
Cost of Old asset given up $420300 (credit)
Gain on exchange $135000 (credit)
Conclusion :
The gain that Sheridan should recognize on this exchange is $135000
Answer:
Liquidity
Explanation:
Liquidity is the degree to which an asset can be converted to cash. Assets that can easily be converted are described as liquid assets and include stocks and bonds.
Illiquid assets are not easy to sell. These assets may take a long time to sell or may be sold at a much cheaper price than the purchase price in order to make a quick sale. These include real estate, motor vehicles etc.
Answer:
Ans. The annuity that will be equivalent to the publisher´s advance would be $26.40 per year, for 9 years at 7% interest rate.
Explanation:
Hi, first, let´s bring that $500 to be paid in 9 years to present value, we need to use the following formula.

Where: r is our discount rate (7%) and n the periods from now when she will receive that $500 amount. This should look like this.

Ok, so the equivalent amount of money today of those $500 in nine years is $271.97, but the author wants $100 today so the remaining amount has to be used to find the equal annual payments to be made in order to be equivalent to re remaining balance ($171.97). We now need to use the following equation.

And we solve for "A" like this




Therefore, the equivalent amount of money of $500 in 9 years is $100 today and $26.40 every year, at the end of the year, for nine years.
Best of luck.
Answer:
Infant-industry argument
Explanation:
Infant-industry argument says that a particular industry can't compete with other international competitors because of the economies of scale. So, they demand a temporary protection until they gain economies of scale to be ready to compete on a level playing field.
Note: This can also come in the category of 'unfair competition' argument as huge economies of scales of well established companies create an unfair environment for nascent industries to compete on a same level.