Who possed absolute power. He believed all humans were naturally wicked and that they needed laws. He didn't believe in the freedoms of natural right and etc.Hope this helps! ;)
Answer:
either-or fallacy
Explanation:
In the either or fallacy a situation is presented as the only alternative of another situation. But in fact there are other alternatives of a situation.
Here, according to Marty unless people get rid of guns they will have to face the same situation of gun violence that people faced in Kentucky, Arkansas, and Colorado. He has not considered what might happen if the guns are still present. There are countries where the existance of guns and violence is not related.
Hence, Marty is using the either-or fallacy.
Yes, Like most strategic bombing during World War II, the aim of the air offensive against Japan was to destroy the enemy's war industries, kill or disable civilian employees of these industries, and undermine civilian morale. If a means is justified by an end, the use of the atomic bomb was justified for it brought Japan to her knees and ended the horrible war. If the war had gone longer, without the use of the atomic bomb, how many thousands and thousands of helpless men, women and children would have needlessly died and suffered ...?
Hope this helps ❤❤
Faulse that is the answer
Answer:
i would definitely say b. feeling safe when you see the police because not many people can and the rest of the choices are definitely not a privilege.
